Better Together: Outcomes of Cooperation Versus Competition in Social Exergaming
Open accessAbstract
Children and adolescents most often play active videogames, or exergames, in a social environment. Social play may enhance the potential benefits of an exergaming experience, much like group exercise and team sports are observed to improve physical activity-related outcomes above those of solitary exercise. Two ubiquitous elements of exergames are cooperation and competition. Previous literature suggests that cooperative and competitive aspects of exergames may affect physiological and psychosocial changes. Competitive play has been found to increase energy expenditure and aggression in short bouts of exergaming. Cooperative exergaming has been found to increase motivation, promote continued play, enhance self-efficacy, and increase pro-social behaviors. In one study, a cooperative exergaming condition also resulted in significant weight loss for overweight and obese adolescents. Individual player differences such as individual preferences, competitiveness, weight status, age, gender, and ethnicity may moderate effects. Although the current volume of literature on competition and cooperation in exergaming is small, social exergames hold promise as an engaging alternative to traditional physical activity interventions and may promote a broad range of positive outcomes for children and adolescents. Principles of cooperation and competition are applicable for developers of health-promoting games. Future research is needed to further understand the mechanisms of how competition and cooperation in social exergaming impact physiological and psychosocial outcomes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Exergaming may support social cohesion, as cooperative play has been shown to increase pro-social behaviors and perceived social support similar to team-based physical activities.
“In addition to physical outcomes, exergaming may support social cohesion, as cooperative play has been shown to increase pro-social behaviors and perceived social support similar to the effects of team-based physical activities [78].”
From Health Benefits of Video Games in Adolescents and Young Adults (2026) · cites this paper as [78]
The Conclusions report that previous research suggests cooperative exergaming increases pro-social behaviors. The Introduction says cooperative play may promote cohesion and peer support much like team sports, but it does not establish that cooperative exergaming has been shown to increase perceived social support. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 134
- Authors
- Marker, A. M., & Staiano, A. E.
- Affiliations
- Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
- Venue
- Games for Health Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-02
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-30
- ISSN
- 2161-783X (ISSN-L)
- 2161-7856
- PMC
- PMC4532894
- OpenAlex
- W2323085590
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 14.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Games for Health Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Louisiana Clinical and Translational Science Center (U54GM104940, 1 U54 GM104940, GM104940)
- National Institutes of Health (GM104940)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM104940, U54GM104940)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Physical education and sports games research
- Keywords
- cooperative play, competitive play, children and adolescents, physical activity, energy expenditure, aggression, motivation, self-efficacy, prosocial behavior, weight loss, overweight and obesity
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Aggression, Body Weight, Child, Competitive Behavior, Cooperative Behavior, Energy Metabolism, Health Promotion, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Motivation, Weight Loss, Exercise, Video Games, Self Efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review