Cited by 99Virus-based gene therapy researchProtein purification and stabilityRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Analysis of particle content of recombinant adeno-associated virus serotype 8 vectors by ion-exchange chromatography

Open access
Lock, Martin, Alvira, Mauricio R., Wilson, James M.·2012·Human Gene Therapy Methods

Abstract

Advances in adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated gene therapy have brought the possibility of commercial manufacturing of AAV vectors one step closer. To realize this prospect, a parallel effort with the goal of ever-increasing sophistication for AAV vector production technology and supporting assays will be required. Among the important release assays for a clinical gene therapy product, those monitoring potentially hazardous contaminants are most critical for patient safety. A prominent contaminant in many AAV vector preparations is vector particles lacking a genome, which can substantially increase the dose of AAV capsid proteins and lead to possible unwanted immunological consequences. Current methods to determine empty particle content suffer from inconsistency, are adversely affected by contaminants, or are not applicable to all serotypes. Here we describe the development of an ion-exchange chromatography-based assay that permits the rapid separation and relative quantification of AAV8 empty and full vector particles through the application of shallow gradients and a strong anion-exchange monolith chromatography medium.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/hgtb.2011.217

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AEC separates empty and full rAAV capsids of serotypes 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9 based on isoelectric point differences caused by the encapsulated negatively charged genome.

    “AEC has been used to separate empty and full rAAV capsids of several serotypes (1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9) on a positively charged stationary phase based on the difference in their isoelectric points caused by the encapsulated, negatively charged genome.”
  • AEC concentration range is limited by detector sensitivity, with a lower limit around 10^11 vg/mL, but FS detectors reduce the limit of detection by an order of magnitude.

    “The method’s concentration range is limited by sensitivity of the detector, with a lower limit of around 1011 vg/mL similarly to OD, but the limit of detection is reduced by an order of magnitude using FS detectors.”
  • AEC requires development and optimization of mobile phase conditions for each serotype, and baseline separation of full and empty particles and resolution of partially filled capsids have not been achieved.

    “Sufficient separation between empty and full capsids requires development and optimization of mobile phase conditions for each serotype, but baseline separation of full and empty particles, as well as resolution of partially filled capsids, has not been achieved so far.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 99

Authors
Lock, M., Alvira, M. R., & Wilson, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Human Gene Therapy Methods
Published
2012-02
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
56-64
ISSN
  • 1946-6536 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6544
OpenAlex
W2001599454
Cited by
99
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Gene Therapy Methods (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • U.S. Public Health Service (HHSN268200748202C)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
recombinant adeno-associated virus, AAV8, ion-exchange chromatography, AAV vector production, gene therapy manufacturing
MeSH terms
Dependovirus, Chromatography, Ion Exchange, DNA, Recombinant, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Genetic Vectors, Virion, Genetic Therapy, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review