Cited by 60Virus-based gene therapy researchMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Two-Dimensional Droplet Digital PCR as a Tool for Titration and Integrity Evaluation of Recombinant Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors

Open access
Furuta-Hanawa, Birei, Yamaguchi, Teruhide, Uchida, Eriko·2019·Human Gene Therapy Methods

Abstract

gene therapy. The clinical dose definition of AAV vector requires the exact quantification as starting doses and for dose-escalation studies. Vector genome (vg) copies measured by quantitative PCR (qPCR) are commonly used for rAAV vector titration, and rAAV vector plasmids DNA is often used for qPCR standards, although the rAAV reference standard materials (RSMs) for serotypes 2 and 8 (rAAV2RSM and rAAV8RSM) are available from American Type Culture Collection. However, qPCR-based determination of the AAV vg is affected by the selection of the qPCR standard and the amplification target sites. In this study, we have developed a new PCR method, two-dimensional droplet digital PCR (2D ddPCR), for the absolute quantitation of target DNA and for evaluating the stability of the rAAV vector. The number of vg copies of rAAV2RSM determined by qPCR dramatically changed when standard plasmid DNAs with different conformations were treated with restriction enzymes, suggesting that qPCR amplification is significantly affected by the secondary structure of the standard. In contrast, the number of vg copies determined by ddPCR was unaffected by using primer probes for different positions of target sites or by the secondary structure conformation of the vg. Furthermore, the integrity of the AAV vg can be monitored using 2D ddPCR with fluorescein- and hexachloro-6-carboxy-fluorescine-labeled probes targeting different positions in the same rAAV genome. The titer of intact rAAV was highly correlated with rAAV activity in an accelerated (37°C) stability study. 2D ddPCR is a useful tool for rAAV vector quantitation and quality evaluation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/hgtb.2019.031

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ddPCR is significantly more precise than qPCR, with repeatability of 2% to 10% CV and intermediate precision of 3% to 8% CV, and is more tolerant to matrix effects and inhibitors.

    “Thus, ddPCR is significantly more precise than qPCR—at repeatability of 2%–10% CV and intermediate precision of 3%–8% CV—and more tolerant to matrix effects and inhibitors.21,35,57,58”
  • Stochastic and systematic sources of qPCR variability, such as low replication efficiency or choice of the primer target sequence, have been identified and alleviated with additional DNA pre-treatments and optimized primers, improving repeatability to 5% to 20% CV and intermediate precision to 15% to 50% CV.

    “Stochastic and systematic sources of this variability, such as low replication efficiency or choice of the primer’s target sequence, have been identified and alleviated with additional DNA pre-treatments and optimized primers,35,57,70,72,80, 81, 82 improving repeatability to 5%–20% CV and intermediate precision to 15%–50% CV.21,24,25,35”
  • Current use of different PCR assay protocols renders titer results incomparable, jeopardizing accuracy and reproducibility of rAAV dosing.

    “As a result, the current use of different assay protocols renders titer results incomparable, jeopardizing accuracy and reproducibility of rAAV dosing.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 60

Authors
Furuta-Hanawa, B., Yamaguchi, T., & Uchida, E.
Affiliations
  • Division of Molecular Target and Gene Therapy Products, National Institute of Health Sciences, Kanagawa, Japan
  • Kanazawa Institute of Technology (JP)
  • National Institute of Health Sciences (JP)
Corresponding author
Uchida, Eriko
Venue
Human Gene Therapy Methods
Published
2019-08
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
127-136
ISSN
  • 1946-6536 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6544
OpenAlex
W2947717893
Cited by
60
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Gene Therapy Methods (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
recombinant adeno-associated virus vectors, vector stability, accelerated stability testing
MeSH terms
Dependovirus, Genetic Vectors, Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review