Two-Dimensional Droplet Digital PCR as a Tool for Titration and Integrity Evaluation of Recombinant Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors
Open accessAbstract
gene therapy. The clinical dose definition of AAV vector requires the exact quantification as starting doses and for dose-escalation studies. Vector genome (vg) copies measured by quantitative PCR (qPCR) are commonly used for rAAV vector titration, and rAAV vector plasmids DNA is often used for qPCR standards, although the rAAV reference standard materials (RSMs) for serotypes 2 and 8 (rAAV2RSM and rAAV8RSM) are available from American Type Culture Collection. However, qPCR-based determination of the AAV vg is affected by the selection of the qPCR standard and the amplification target sites. In this study, we have developed a new PCR method, two-dimensional droplet digital PCR (2D ddPCR), for the absolute quantitation of target DNA and for evaluating the stability of the rAAV vector. The number of vg copies of rAAV2RSM determined by qPCR dramatically changed when standard plasmid DNAs with different conformations were treated with restriction enzymes, suggesting that qPCR amplification is significantly affected by the secondary structure of the standard. In contrast, the number of vg copies determined by ddPCR was unaffected by using primer probes for different positions of target sites or by the secondary structure conformation of the vg. Furthermore, the integrity of the AAV vg can be monitored using 2D ddPCR with fluorescein- and hexachloro-6-carboxy-fluorescine-labeled probes targeting different positions in the same rAAV genome. The titer of intact rAAV was highly correlated with rAAV activity in an accelerated (37°C) stability study. 2D ddPCR is a useful tool for rAAV vector quantitation and quality evaluation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ddPCR is significantly more precise than qPCR, with repeatability of 2% to 10% CV and intermediate precision of 3% to 8% CV, and is more tolerant to matrix effects and inhibitors.
“Thus, ddPCR is significantly more precise than qPCR—at repeatability of 2%–10% CV and intermediate precision of 3%–8% CV—and more tolerant to matrix effects and inhibitors.21,35,57,58”
From Analytical methods for process and product characterization of recombinant adeno-associated virus-based gene therapies (2021) · cites this paper as [57]
Stochastic and systematic sources of qPCR variability, such as low replication efficiency or choice of the primer target sequence, have been identified and alleviated with additional DNA pre-treatments and optimized primers, improving repeatability to 5% to 20% CV and intermediate precision to 15% to 50% CV.
“Stochastic and systematic sources of this variability, such as low replication efficiency or choice of the primer’s target sequence, have been identified and alleviated with additional DNA pre-treatments and optimized primers,35,57,70,72,80, 81, 82 improving repeatability to 5%–20% CV and intermediate precision to 15%–50% CV.21,24,25,35”
From Analytical methods for process and product characterization of recombinant adeno-associated virus-based gene therapies (2021) · cites this paper as [57]
Current use of different PCR assay protocols renders titer results incomparable, jeopardizing accuracy and reproducibility of rAAV dosing.
“As a result, the current use of different assay protocols renders titer results incomparable, jeopardizing accuracy and reproducibility of rAAV dosing.”
From Analytical methods for process and product characterization of recombinant adeno-associated virus-based gene therapies (2021) · cites this paper as [57]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 60
- Authors
- Furuta-Hanawa, B., Yamaguchi, T., & Uchida, E.
- Affiliations
- Division of Molecular Target and Gene Therapy Products, National Institute of Health Sciences, Kanagawa, Japan
- Kanazawa Institute of Technology (JP)
- National Institute of Health Sciences (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Uchida, Eriko
- ORCID
- Yamaguchi, Teruhide
- Venue
- Human Gene Therapy Methods
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 127-136
- ISSN
- 1946-6536 (ISSN-L)
- 1946-6544
- PMC
- PMC6707039
- OpenAlex
- W2947717893
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Human Gene Therapy Methods (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Keywords
- recombinant adeno-associated virus vectors, vector stability, accelerated stability testing
- MeSH terms
- Dependovirus, Genetic Vectors, Polymerase Chain Reaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review