The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Points to Consider Response with Clinical Protocol, July 6, 1990
Abstract
SCIENTIFIC ABSTRACT Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) due to deficiency of the purine metabolic enzyme adenosine deaminase (ADA) is a fatal childhood immunodeficiency disease. Immune reconstitution by transplantation with HLA-identical bone marrow is the treatment of choice. For patients not candidates for bone marrow transplantation, we propose to attempt immune reconstitution by using infusions of autologous T lymphocytes expanded in tissue culture and genetically corrected by insertion of a normal ADA gene using retroviral-mediated gene transfer. The vector is LASN, in which the human ADA gene is promoted by the LTR while the NeoR gene is driven by the SV40 early gene promoter. The packaging line is PA317. The protocol is designed to have two parts. In Part 1, autologous gene-corrected T lymphocytes would be infused repeatedly in low numbers in order to build an immune repertoire of T cells and also to obtain information as to how long gene corrected T cells survive in vivo. In Part 2A, the gene-corrected T cells would be selected in G418 and/or 2′deoxyadenosine and reinfused into the patient at monthly intervals for approximately 6 months. The goals would be essentially the same as in Part 1. In Part 2B, the number of gene-corrected T cells would be escalated in half-log increments to the predicted therapeutic level (probably around 1 × 109/kg). 1–3 × 109/kg gene-corrected cells would be infused several times and the patient would be monitored in order to determine if significant clinical improvement has occurred.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
IMMUNOLOGICAL RECONSTITUTION OF SEX-LINKED LYMPHOPENIC IMMUNOLOGICAL DEFICIENCY
Gatti, R., Meuwissen, H., Allen, H., Hong, R., & Good, R. (1968) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(68)92673-1 · Cited by 1,018
Cited by
Toward Nanotechnology-Enabled Approaches against the COVID-19 Pandemic
Weiss, C., Carriere, M., Fusco, L., Capua, I., Regla-Nava, J. A., Pasquali, M., Scott, J. A., Vitale, F., Unal, M. A., Mattevi, C., et al. (2020) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c03697 · Cited by 601
Lentiviral Vectors in Gene Therapy: Their Current Status and Future Potential
Escors, D., & Breckpot, K. (2010) · Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis · doi:10.1007/s00005-010-0063-4 · Cited by 344
Production and clinical development of nanoparticles for gene delivery
Chen, J., Guo, Z., Tian, H., & Chen, X. (2016) · Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development · doi:10.1038/mtm.2016.23 · Cited by 274
Bunnell, B. A., Muul, L. M., Donahue, R. E., Blaese, R. M., & Morgan, R. A. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.17.7739 · Cited by 258
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, W. F., Blaese, R. M., & Culver, K.
- Venue
- Human Gene Therapy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1990-10
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 331-362
- ISSN
- 1043-0342 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7422
- OpenAlex
- W2091994827
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Points to Consider Response with Clinical Protocol, July 6, 1990. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/hum.1990.1.3-331
- The paper
- Anderson, W. F., Blaese, R. M., & Culver, K. (1990). Points to Consider Response with Clinical Protocol, July 6, 1990. Human Gene Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.1990.1.3-331
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.