Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In Vivo Nasal Potential Difference: Techniques and Protocols for Assessing Efficacy of Gene Transfer in Cystic Fibrosis

Knowles, M. R., Paradiso, A. M., Boucher, R. C.·1995·Human Gene Therapy

Abstract

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a monogenetic disease that is associated with chronic airways disease and early death. The pulmonary disease reflects mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, and associated abnormal epithelial ion transport, including defective cAMP-mediated (CFTR) Cl¯ secretion and an accelerated rate of basal Na+ transport. With the development of vectors for gene therapy, the airway epithelium of CF patients has been targeted for studies of gene transfer. The biological efficacy of gene transfer of the normal CFTR cDNA into CF respiratory epithelia can be assessed by in vivo measurements of the transepithelial potential difference (PD), a parameter of ion transport that reflects the expression and function of CFTR. This paper describes techniques that can be used to discriminate in vivo between the ion transport phenotype of normal subjects and patients with cystic fibrosis. Protocols are outlined to allow assessment of individual components of the electrolyte transport phenotype, i.e., the magnitude of the basal and cAMP-mediated (CFTR) Cl¯ secretion, and the rate of Na+ transport. The physiologic basis of the protocols and important technical features of these measurements are defined. If performed properly, the in vivo nasal PD technique clearly discriminates between normal subjects and cystic fibrosis patients, and can yield estimates of the biological efficacy of gene transfer to achieve correction of the electrolyte transport defects in CF patients. Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a recessive genetic disease that reflects mutations in the gene coding for the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. Chronic pulmonary disease reflects abnormal ion transport by airway epithelium, which is the target for gene transfer using viral and liposomal gene transfer vectors. Protocols involving measurement of potential difference (PD) in vivo have been developed to discriminate between the ion transport phenotype for normal subjects and CF patients. These protocols allow assessment of the basal and cAMP-mediated (CFTR) Cl¯ secretion, and the rate of Na+ transport. Taken together, these methodologies allow in vivo estimates of the biological efficacy of gene transfer of the normal CFTR cDNA to respiratory epithelium of CF patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/hum.1995.6.4-445

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 308

Metadata

Authors
Knowles, M. R., Paradiso, A. M., & Boucher, R. C.
Venue
Human Gene Therapy
Published
1995-04
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
445-455
ISSN
  • 1043-0342 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7422
OpenAlex
W2076934605
Cited by
308
References
3
FWCI
15.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vivo Nasal Potential Difference: Techniques and Protocols for Assessing Efficacy of Gene Transfer in Cystic Fibrosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/hum.1995.6.4-445
The paper
Knowles, M. R., Paradiso, A. M., & Boucher, R. C. (1995). In Vivo Nasal Potential Difference: Techniques and Protocols for Assessing Efficacy of Gene Transfer in Cystic Fibrosis. Human Gene Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.1995.6.4-445

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.