Cited by 345CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringVirus-based gene therapy researchRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Adenovirus-Mediated Somatic Genome Editing of Pten by CRISPR/Cas9 in Mouse Liver in Spite of Cas9-Specific Immune Responses

Open access
Wang, Dan, Mou, Haiwei, Li, Shaoyong, Li, Yingxiang, Hough, Soren, Tran, Karen, Li, Jia, Yin, Hao +5 more·2015·Human Gene Therapy

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9 derived from the bacterial adaptive immunity pathway is a powerful tool for genome editing, but the safety profiles of in vivo delivered Cas9 (including host immune responses to the bacterial Cas9 protein) have not been comprehensively investigated in model organisms. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a prevalent human liver disease characterized by excessive fat accumulation in the liver. In this study, we used adenovirus (Ad) vector to deliver a Streptococcus pyogenes-derived Cas9 system (SpCas9) targeting Pten, a gene involved in NASH and a negative regulator of the PI3K-AKT pathway, in mouse liver. We found that the Ad vector mediated efficient Pten gene editing even in the presence of typical Ad vector-associated immunotoxicity in the liver. Four months after vector infusion, mice receiving the Pten gene-editing Ad vector showed massive hepatomegaly and features of NASH, consistent with the phenotypes following Cre-loxP-induced Pten deficiency in mouse liver. We also detected induction of humoral immunity against SpCas9 and the potential presence of an SpCas9-specific cellular immune response. Our findings provide a strategy to model human liver diseases in mice and highlight the importance considering Cas9-specific immune responses in future translational studies involving in vivo delivery of CRISPR/Cas9.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/hum.2015.087

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In FVB/NJ mice, delivery of Cas9 protein with GFP to the liver using an Ad vector resulted in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell infiltration in liver sections, anti-Cas9 antibodies in sera, and a Cas9-specific cellular immune response; transgene-GFP expression disappeared by day 14.

    “In a study aimed at evaluating Cas9-related immune responses, the Cas9 protein with GFP was delivered to the liver of FVB/NJ mice using an Ad vector.Fourteen days post-injection, CD4 + and CD8 + T-cell infiltration was observed in liver sections, while anti-Cas9 antibodies were found in the sera collected from the mice.Further, splenocytes harvested for the cytokine release assay after Cas9”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 345

Authors
Wang, D., Mou, H., Li, S., Li, Y., Hough, S., Tran, K., Li, J., Yin, H., Anderson, D. G., Sontheimer, E. J., Weng, Z., Gao, G., & Xue, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research At MIT (US)
  • Harvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology (US)
Venue
Human Gene Therapy
Published
2015-07
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
432-442
ISSN
  • 1043-0342 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7422
OpenAlex
W3020907828
Cited by
345
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 4
FWCI
15.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Gene Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Government of Jiangxi Province
  • Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
  • National Institutes of Health (CA151884)
  • National Cancer Institute (5‑U54‑CA151884‑04, U54CA151884, R00CA169512)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P01AI100263)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS076991)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, PTEN, adenoviral vector, somatic genome editing, liver, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, SpCas9, humoral immunity, hepatomegaly, PI3K/Akt signaling, Cre-loxP system, in vivo gene delivery
MeSH terms
CRISPR-Associated Protein 9, Adenoviridae, Animals, Bacterial Proteins, Disease Models, Animal, Endonucleases, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Genetic Therapy, Mice, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review