Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 244

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Use of Monoclonal Anti-mouse Immunoglobulin to Detect Mouse Antibodies

YELTON, DALE E., DESAYMARD, CATHERINE, SCHARFF, MATTHEW D.·1981·Hybridoma

Abstract

Rat monoclonal antibodies specific for mouse kappa light chains and mouse gamma heavy chains have been generated. These rat monoclonal antibodies have been biosynthetically labelled with 35S methionine. The free label was dialyzed from the medium and, without further purification, the medium containing the radioactive monoclonal antibody was used in a radioimmunoassay to screen the sera of the immunized animals and hybridomas for specific mouse antibodies of the IgG class.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/hyb.1.1981.1.5

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 244

Metadata

Authors
YELTON, D. E., DESAYMARD, C., & SCHARFF, M. D.
Venue
Hybridoma
Published
1981-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
5-11
ISSN
0272-457X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008636680
Cited by
244
References
0
FWCI
10.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of Monoclonal Anti-mouse Immunoglobulin to Detect Mouse Antibodies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/hyb.1.1981.1.5
The paper
YELTON, D. E., DESAYMARD, C., & SCHARFF, M. D. (1981). Use of Monoclonal Anti-mouse Immunoglobulin to Detect Mouse Antibodies. Hybridoma. https://doi.org/10.1089/hyb.1.1981.1.5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.