Cited by 25Inhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesPharmaceutical studies and practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lung Deposition and Pharmacokinetics of Nebulized Cyclosporine in Lung Transplant Patients

Open access
Corcoran, T.E., Niven, R., Verret, W., Dilly, S., Johnson, B.A.·2014·Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery

Abstract

Background Inhaled cyclosporine (CsA) is being investigated as a prophylaxis for lung transplant rejection. Lung deposition and systemic exposure of nebulized CsA in lung transplant patients was evaluated as part of the Phase 3 cyclosporine inhalation solution (CIS) trial (CYCLIST). Methods Ten patients received 300 mg of CIS (62.5 mg/mL CsA in propylene glycol) admixed with 148 MBq of Tc-DTPA (technetium-99m bound to diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid) administered using a Sidestream(®) disposable jet nebulizer. Deposition was assessed using a dual-headed gamma camera. Blood samples were collected over a 24-hr time period after aerosol dosing and analyzed for CsA levels. A pharmacokinetic analysis of the resulting blood concentration versus time profiles was performed. Results The average total deposited dose was 53.7 ± 12.7 mg. Average pulmonary dose was 31.8 ± 16.3 mg, and stomach dose averaged 15.5 ± 11.1 mg. Device performance was consistent, with breathing maneuvers influencing dose variation. Predose coaching with five of 10 patients reduced stomach deposition (22.6 ± 11.2 vs. 8.3 ± 5.2 mg; p=0.03). Blood concentrations declined quickly from a maximum of 372 ± 140 ng/mL to 15.3 ± 9.7 ng/mL at 24 hr post dose. Levels of AUC(0-24) [area under the concentration vs. time curve from 0 to 24 hr] averaged 1,493 ± 746 ng hr/mL. On a three times per week dose regimen, this represents Conclusions Substantial doses of CsA can be delivered to the lungs of lung transplant patients…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jamp.2013.1042

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Undetectable plasma levels of LTI-03, a hydrophobic peptide, are consistent with the pharmacokinetic behavior of other inhaled hydrophobic compounds, such as inhaled cyclosporine formulations, which exhibit rapid and sustained lung absorption with minimal systemic exposure.

    “Undetectable plasma levels of LTI-03, a hydrophobic peptide, are consistent with the PK behavior of other inhaled hydrophobic compounds, such as inhaled cyclosporine formulations, which exhibit rapid and sustained lung absorption with minimal systemic exposure32.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1164/ajrccm.153.4.8616581 · DOI
  2. McCurry KR, 1997, Clin Transpl., 209
  3. 10.1097/00007890-199707270-00015 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0022-5223(97)70331-3 · DOI
  5. 10.1183/09031936.04.00058504 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.addr.2006.07.016 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0022-5223(97)70144-2 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.healun.2012.08.004 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1056/NEJMoa043204 · DOI
  10. 10.1089/jam.2007.0620 · DOI
  11. Pitcairn G, 1997, J Aerosol Med., 10, 197
  12. 10.1023/A:1022275222207 · DOI
  13. 10.1183/09031936.04.00059204 · DOI
  14. Verbeken EK, 1994, J Appl Physiol., 77, 1875, 10.1152/jappl.1994.77.4.1875 · DOI
  15. Verbeken EK, 1992, J Appl Physiol., 72, 2343, 10.1152/jappl.1992.72.6.2343 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/978-3-642-87553-3 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0021-8502(86)90035-2 · DOI
  18. 10.1164/ajrccm.160.5.9809123 · DOI
  19. Laube BL, 1996, J Aerosol Med., 9, S77, 10.1089/jam.1996.9.Suppl_1.S-77 · DOI
  20. 10.1164/ajrccm/136.6.1445 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01071.x · DOI
  22. 10.1089/jam.2007.0626 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1399-3011.1994.tb00386.x · DOI
  24. 10.1016/0009-9236(95)90168-X · DOI
  25. 10.1097/01.TP.0000076473.71399.26 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Corcoran, T. E., Niven, R., Verret, W., Dilly, S., & Johnson, B. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • APT Therapeutics (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Corcoran, T.E.
Venue
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery
Published
2014-06
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
178-184
ISSN
  • 1941-2703 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2711
OpenAlex
W1144699317
Cited by
25
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pittsburgh (UL1TR000005, UL1RR024153, RR024153)
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000005, RR024153, UL1RR024153 and UL1TR000005)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024153)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
cyclosporine, lung transplantation, lung deposition, aerosol deposition, pharmacokinetics, Tc-99m DTPA, jet nebulizer, systemic exposure, propylene glycol
MeSH terms
Administration, Inhalation, Adult, Aerosols, Aged, Drug Administration Schedule, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Lung, Middle Aged, Nebulizers and Vaporizers, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Radionuclide Imaging, Lung Transplantation, Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate, Cyclosporine, Treatment Outcome, Drug Monitoring, Radiopharmaceuticals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review