Cited by 437Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactionsinterferon and immune responsesGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

GAS Elements: A Few Nucleotides with a Major Impact on Cytokine-Induced Gene Expression

DECKER, THOMAS, KOVARIK, PAVEL, MEINKE, ANDREAS·1997·Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research

Abstract

Gamma interferon activation site (GAS) elements are short stretches of DNA, originally defined as a requirement for the rapid transcriptional induction of genes in response to interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma). The protein complex binding to GAS sequences in IFN-gamma-treated cells, the gamma interferon activation factor (GAF), is a dimer of Stat1, the prototype of a family of cytokine-responsive transcription factors, the signal transducers and activators of transcription. To date, seven different Stats are known (excluding alternatively spliced or processed forms), six of which recognize the same small palindromic consensus sequence TTCN2-4 GAA that defines a GAS element. Because one or several Stats take part in nuclear signaling in response to most cytokines or growth factors, the GAS sequence has changed from being viewed as a specific site for IFN-activated GAF to becoming the general nuclear end of the Jak-Stat signaling pathways. This review focuses on the identification and definition of GAS elements, their interaction with Stat transcription factors, and their contribution to the specificity of cytokine-induced gene expression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jir.1997.17.121

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GAS sites are generally poorly conserved, making it difficult to predict actual chromatin binding sites.

    “We also point out the fact that GAS sites are generally poorly conserved, making it difficult to predict actual chromatin binding sites (Decker et al. 1997), indicating that the distinction between”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 152 · Cited by 437

Authors
DECKER, T., KOVARIK, P., & MEINKE, A.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Venue
Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research
Published
1997-03
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
121-134
ISSN
  • 1079-9907 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7465
OpenAlex
W2013958910
Cited by
437
References
152
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
10.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
STAT1, signal transducer and activator of transcription, cytokine-induced gene expression, interferon-gamma, JAK/STAT signaling, transcription factor binding sites, transcriptional regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA-Binding Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Interferon-gamma, Transcription Factors, Signal Transduction, Transcriptional Activation, Receptors, Growth Factor, Receptors, Cytokine, Interferon-Stimulated Gene Factor 3

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review