Cited by 32Seed and Plant BiochemistryProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive PeptidesPhytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications

Biological Effects of Hydrolyzed Quinoa Extract from Seeds of Chenopodium quinoa Willd.

Meneguetti, Quele Adriana, Brenzan, Mislaine Adriana, Batista, Marcia Regina, Bazotte, Roberto Barbosa, Silva, Daniel Rodrigues, Garcia Cortez, Diógenes Aparício·2011·Journal of Medicinal Food

Abstract

An extract from seeds of Chenopodium quinoa Willd. (quinoa), termed hydrolyzed quinoa (HQ), was obtained by enzymatic hydrolysis from seeds of the quinoa variety BRS-Piabiru. Analysis of the physical and chemical properties of quinoa and HQ showed that the hydrolyzed extract is rich in essential amino acids, particularly those with branched chains (leucine, isoleucine, and valine). In addition, we evaluated the biological effects of HQ, particularly the toxicological potential. For this purpose, male Wistar rats were assigned randomly to four groups: (1) sedentary supplemented group, which received HQ (2,000 mg/kg); (2) sedentary control group, non-supplemented; (3) exercised supplemented group (i.e., rats subjected to aerobic physical exercise that received HQ [2,000 mg/kg]); and (4) exercised control group (i.e., rats subjected to aerobic physical exercise, non-supplemented). After 30 days, all groups were analyzed for levels of serum glucose, cholesterol, triacylglycerol, total protein, albumin, uric acid, and urea and activities of the enzymes alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase. Body weight gain, dietary intake, and lipid deposition were also analyzed. The results showed no hepatic and renal toxicity of HQ. Moreover, decreased food intake, body weight, fat deposition, and blood triacylglycerol level were observed in the supplemented groups (sedentary and exercised supplemented groups). These results suggest a potential use of HQ in human nutrition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jmf.2010.0096

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 32

Authors
Meneguetti, Q. A., Brenzan, M. A., Batista, M. R., Bazotte, R. B., Silva, D. R., & Garcia Cortez, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual de Maringá (BR)
  • Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, State University of Maringá, Paraná State, Brazil.
Venue
Journal of Medicinal Food
Published
2011-06
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
653-657
ISSN
  • 1096-620X (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7600
OpenAlex
W2093476251
Cited by
32
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Medicinal Food (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Seed and Plant Biochemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications
Keywords
quinoa, enzymatic hydrolysis, branched-chain amino acids, essential amino acids, hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, aerobic exercise, lipid accumulation, serum lipids, dietary intake, functional food supplement
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Weight, Female, Hydrolysis, Male, Plant Extracts, Random Allocation, Seeds, Rats, Wistar, Chenopodium quinoa, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review