Cited by 58Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesDiabetes Treatment and ManagementHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients

An approach to diabetes mellitus in hospice and palliative medicine

Angelo, Mark, Ruchalski, Charles, Sproge, Barbara J.·2011·Journal of Palliative Medicine

Abstract

Hospice and palliative medicine practitioners frequently encounter diabetes and associated complications as comorbidities in end-of-life patients. As the patient with diabetes approaches end-of-life, there comes a time when tight glycemic control can not only prove of questionable benefit, but has the potential to cause harm. The medical literature offers little guidance on managing these complications appropriately. This article identifies three distinct classifications of patients with diabetes approaching the ends of their lives due to advanced illnesses. The authors propose a specific framework to guide management in patients with diabetes and advanced disease who are relatively stable, experiencing impending death or organ failure, or actively dying. The authors provide comprehensive information on commonly used diabetic medications, with necessary considerations and dose adjustments for these populations. The goal of the approach is to address individual patient needs, provide guidance for patients and caregivers, and ultimately maximize outcomes for patients with diabetes in the palliative care setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jpm.2010.0191

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is no consensus for the management of type 1 diabetes in the palliative or end-of-life scenario.

    “There is, however, no consensus for the management of type 1 diabetes in this scenario (69).”
  • There is no consensus for the management of type 1 diabetes in the end-of-life scenario.

    “There is, however, no consensus for the management of type 1 diabetes in this scenario (71).”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [71]

  • There is no consensus for the end-of-life management of type 1 diabetes.

    “There is, however, no consensus for the end-of-life management of type 1 diabetes”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [78]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Angelo, M., Ruchalski, C., & Sproge, B. J.
Affiliations
  • Cooper University Hospital (US)
  • Temple University (US)
Corresponding author
Angelo, Mark
Venue
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2011-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
83-87
ISSN
  • 1096-6218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7740
OpenAlex
W1998031129
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, end-of-life care, palliative care, hospice care, glycemic control, diabetes complications, advanced disease, dose adjustment, impending death, organ failure
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Diabetes Mellitus, Hospices, Humans, Palliative Care, Pennsylvania, Diabetes Complications, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review