Assessing end-of-life preferences for advanced dementia in rural patients using an educational video: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objective Few studies have evaluated the end-of-life preferences of elderly patients in rural communities and whether preferences are associated with level of health literacy. Design Randomized controlled trial of a goals-of-care video decision aid of advanced dementia. Participants Elderly subjects (65 years or older) at a primary care clinic in rural Louisiana. Methods Half of subjects heard a verbal description of advanced dementia and the goals of care; the other half heard the same verbal description and then viewed the video decision aid. End points were the preferred goal of care in advanced dementia: life-prolonging care (cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], etc.), limited care (hospitalization but not CPR), or comfort care (symptom relief). The principal category for analysis was the difference in proportions of subjects preferring comfort care for each characteristic including randomization group and health literacy level. Results Seventy-six subjects were randomized to the verbal (n = 43) or video (n = 33) arms of the study. Among subjects receiving the verbal description of advanced dementia and the goals of care, 31 (72%) preferred comfort; 5 (12%) chose limited; and 7 (16%) desired life-prolonging. In the video group, 30 (91%) preferred comfort; 3 (9%) chose limited; and none desired life-prolonging (χ(2) = 6.3, df = 2, p = 0.047). Factors associated with greater likelihood of opting for comfort included greater health literacy (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 12.1;…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A systematic review of cardiac arrest literature identified variability in the outcomes reported, differences in outcome definitions, and differences in the timepoint and method used to record outcomes.
“A systematic review of cardiac arrest literature identified variability in the outcomes reported, differences in outcome definitions, and differences in the timepoint and method used to record outcomes. 282”
From European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions (2021) · cites this paper as [282]
Educational CPR videos and structured patient-centred interviews can be helpful in decision making, with more patients likely to forgo CPR and focus on comfort.
“Educational CPR videos and structured patient-centred interviews can be helpful in decision making with more patients likely to forgo CPR and focus on comfort. 4,45,70,273,274”
From European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions (2021) · cites this paper as [273]
The patient's perspective on outcome was rarely included in cardiac arrest literature.
“The patient's perspective on outcome was rarely included.”
From European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions (2021) · cites this paper as [282]
Cites
Literacy and misunderstanding prescription drug labels
Davis, T. C., Wolf, M. S., Bass, P. F., Thompson, J. A., Tilson, H. H., Neuberger, M., & Parker, R. M. (2006) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-145-12-200612190-00144 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Lewis, K., Barry, M. J., Bennett, C. L., Eden, K. B., Holmes-Rovner, M., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Lyddiatt, A., Thomson, R., et al. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001431.pub5 · Cited by 6,685 · see citing works
McMahan, R. D., Tellez, I., & Sudore, R. L. (2021) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.16801 · Cited by 506 · see citing works
Tools to Promote Shared Decision Making in Serious Illness: A Systematic Review
Austin, C. A., Mohottige, D., Sudore, R. L., Smith, A. K., & Hanson, L. C. (2015) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1679 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions
Mentzelopoulos, S. D., Couper, K., Voorde, P. V. D., Druwé, P., Blom, M., Perkins, G. D., Lulic, I., Djakow, J., Raffay, V., Lilja, G., et al. (2021) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.017 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Oczkowski, S. J., Chung, H.-O., Hanvey, L., Mbuagbaw, L., & You, J. J. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150671 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
- Authors
- Volandes, A. E., Ferguson, L. A., Davis, A. D., Hull, N. C., Green, M. J., Chang, Y., Deep, K., & Paasche-Orlow, M. K.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
- Corresponding author
- Volandes, Angelo E.
- Venue
- Journal of Palliative Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 169-177
- ISSN
- 1096-6218 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7740
- OpenAlex
- W1977472032
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Keywords
- end-of-life preferences, advanced dementia, goals of care, health literacy, rural elderly, comfort care, cardiopulmonary resuscitation
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dementia, Female, Humans, Louisiana, Male, Rural Population, Terminal Care, Videotape Recording, Patient Preference
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review