Cited by 91Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationPalliative and Oncologic Care

A randomized controlled trial of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation video in advance care planning for progressive pancreas and hepatobiliary cancer patients

Open access
Epstein, Andrew S., Volandes, Angelo E., Chen, Ling Y., Gary, Kristen A., Li, Yuelin, Agre, Patricia, Levin, Tomer T., Reidy, Diane L. +7 more·2013·Journal of Palliative Medicine

Abstract

Background Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an important advance directive (AD) topic in patients with progressive cancer; however such discussions are challenging. Objective This study investigates whether video educational information about CPR engenders broader advance care planning (ACP) discourse. Methods Patients with progressive pancreas or hepatobiliary cancer were randomized to an educational CPR video or a similar CPR narrative. The primary end-point was the difference in ACP documentation one month posttest between arms. Secondary end-points included study impressions; pre- and post-intervention knowledge of and preferences for CPR and mechanical ventilation; and longitudinal patient outcomes. Results Fifty-six subjects were consented and analyzed. Rates of ACP documentation (either formal ADs or documented discussions) were 40% in the video arm (12/30) compared to 15% in the narrative arm (4/26), OR=3.6 [95% CI: 0.9-18.0], p=0.07. Post-intervention knowledge was higher in both arms. Posttest, preferences for CPR had changed in the video arm but not in the narrative arm. Preferences regarding mechanical ventilation did not change in either arm. The majority of subjects in both arms reported the information as helpful and comfortable to discuss, and they recommended it to others. More deaths occurred in the video arm compared to the narrative arm, and more subjects died in hospice settings in the video arm. Conclusions This pilot randomized trial addressing do…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jpm.2012.0524

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cardiac arrest outcome is multifactorial and may include long-term changes in functional, emotional, physical, cognitive and social domains, all associated with health-related quality of life.

    “Today, it is understood that cardiac arrest outcome is multifactorial and may include long-term changes in functional, emotional, physical, cognitive and social domains, all associated with health-related quality of life. 283”
  • Educational CPR videos and structured patient-centred interviews can be helpful in decision making, with more patients likely to forgo CPR and focus on comfort.

    “Educational CPR videos and structured patient-centred interviews can be helpful in decision making with more patients likely to forgo CPR and focus on comfort. 4,45,70,273,274”
  • Traditionally, cardiac arrest outcomes have been clinician-reported, and often dichotomised as good or poor.

    “Traditionally, cardiac arrest outcomes have been clinician-reported, and often dichotomised as good or poor. 283”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Epstein, A. S., Volandes, A. E., Chen, L. Y., Gary, K. A., Li, Y., Agre, P., Levin, T. T., Reidy, D. L., Meng, R. D., Segal, N. H., Yu, K. H., Abou-Alfa, G. K., Janjigian, Y. Y., Kelsen, D. P., & O'Reilly, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Corresponding author
Epstein, Andrew S.
Venue
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2013-06-01
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
623-631
ISSN
  • 1096-6218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7740
OpenAlex
W2090869775
Cited by
91
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA008748)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
cardiopulmonary resuscitation, advance care planning, advance directives, educational videos, pancreatic cancer, hepatobiliary cancer, end-of-life decisions, hospice use, patient education
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Biliary Tract Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Patient Education as Topic, Pilot Projects, Video Recording, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Disease Progression, Advance Care Planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review