Cited by 49Treatment of Major DepressionPain Management and Opioid UsePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

The Efficacy of Ketamine in the Palliative Care Setting: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

Goldman, Nathaniel, Frankenthaler, Michael, Klepacz, Lidia·2019·Journal of Palliative Medicine

Abstract

Background: Previous literature suggests that ketamine may be an effective drug in the palliative care population as this drug has been shown to treat multiple conditions that are common in these patients. Objective: This review examines the efficacy of ketamine for the treatment of depression and physical pain in palliative care patients. Methods: Eleven studies were included on the topic of ketamine as an antidepressant in the palliative care population. Additionally, 5 RCT studies were included on the topic of physical pain in this population. Results: All 11 studies, including one RCT, found antidepressant effects of ketamine in this patient population. Ketamine's effect on treating physical pain was mixed with the largest and most recent RCTs suggesting no significant analgesic effect. Discussion: This review suggests that starting qualified patients on intravenous (IV) ketamine and switching to oral or intranasal administration may be the most effective and convenient for treating depression, especially for patients who wish to receive treatment at home. Significant analgesia was found in patients who received epidural or intrathecal ketamine as well as in one study using intravenous administration. More research is necessary to determine which palliative care patients may benefit from ketamine treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jpm.2018.0627

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 49

Authors
Goldman, N., Frankenthaler, M., & Klepacz, L.
Affiliations
  • New York Medical College (US)
  • Westchester Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Goldman, Nathaniel
Venue
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2019-09
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
1154-1161
ISSN
  • 1096-6218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7740
OpenAlex
W2946059656
Cited by
49
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Touro Scholar (Touro College) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
ketamine, palliative care, depression, pain management, antidepressant efficacy, analgesia, intrathecal ketamine, epidural ketamine, intranasal ketamine, oral ketamine, home treatment
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antidepressive Agents, Depression, Female, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Ketamine, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Palliative Care, Pain Management, Administration, Intravenous, Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review