The Efficacy of Ketamine in the Palliative Care Setting: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature
Abstract
Background: Previous literature suggests that ketamine may be an effective drug in the palliative care population as this drug has been shown to treat multiple conditions that are common in these patients. Objective: This review examines the efficacy of ketamine for the treatment of depression and physical pain in palliative care patients. Methods: Eleven studies were included on the topic of ketamine as an antidepressant in the palliative care population. Additionally, 5 RCT studies were included on the topic of physical pain in this population. Results: All 11 studies, including one RCT, found antidepressant effects of ketamine in this patient population. Ketamine's effect on treating physical pain was mixed with the largest and most recent RCTs suggesting no significant analgesic effect. Discussion: This review suggests that starting qualified patients on intravenous (IV) ketamine and switching to oral or intranasal administration may be the most effective and convenient for treating depression, especially for patients who wish to receive treatment at home. Significant analgesia was found in patients who received epidural or intrathecal ketamine as well as in one study using intravenous administration. More research is necessary to determine which palliative care patients may benefit from ketamine treatment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Each review said that larger, better-designed studies are needed to settle effectiveness for this indication.
“In all reviews, it was reported that larger and methodologically better studies are needed to draw definite conclusions on effectiveness for this indication.”
From Psychedelics for the treatment of depression, anxiety, and existential distress in patients with a terminal illness: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as Goldman et al., 2019
A review of ketamine for palliative-care depression and pain reported antidepressant effects.
“A review on the efficacy of ketamine for depression and pain in palliative care patients found antidepressant effects (Goldman et al., 2019).”
From Psychedelics for the treatment of depression, anxiety, and existential distress in patients with a terminal illness: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as Goldman et al., 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 49
- Authors
- Goldman, N., Frankenthaler, M., & Klepacz, L.
- Affiliations
- New York Medical College (US)
- Westchester Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Goldman, Nathaniel
- ORCID
- Goldman, Nathaniel
- Venue
- Journal of Palliative Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1154-1161
- ISSN
- 1096-6218 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7740
- OpenAlex
- W2946059656
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Touro Scholar (Touro College) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Keywords
- ketamine, palliative care, depression, pain management, antidepressant efficacy, analgesia, intrathecal ketamine, epidural ketamine, intranasal ketamine, oral ketamine, home treatment
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antidepressive Agents, Depression, Female, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Ketamine, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Palliative Care, Pain Management, Administration, Intravenous, Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review