Cited by 79Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Opioid UsePediatric Pain Management Techniques

The Prevalence and Age-Related Characteristics of Pain in a Sample of Women Veterans Receiving Primary Care

Haskell, Sally G., Heapy, Alicia, Reid, M. Carrington, Papas, Rebecca K., Kerns, Robert D.·2006·Journal of Women's Health

Abstract

Background Women veterans are a growing but understudied population believed to be at increased risk for pain problems. Because of risk factors and clinical observations, we hypothesized that women veterans might have a high prevalence of pain and, thus, sought to determine the prevalence of (and age-related variations in) pain and to characterize several key pain dimensions in a sample of women veterans. Methods Women with routine appointments at the VA Connecticut Women's Health Center were recruited for study. Participants completed a 59-item questionnaire that provided information about their demographic, clinical, and pain status, as well as use of health services. Results Of 236 women approached, 213 (89%) completed the questionnaire. The mean age was 52 years, and most (78%) reported an ongoing pain problem. For those reporting pain, the mean duration of pain was 6 years, average pain intensity was 6.3 (range 1-10), and commonly endorsed pain sites included lower extremity (68%), low back (63%), and shoulder (48%). The most frequently endorsed treatment (by 80%) was analgesic medication use. Across the four age categories (20-35, 36-50, 51-65, and > or =66 years), pain prevalences were 64%, 89%, 83%, and 69%, respectively. Although pain intensity levels did not vary across age groups, older women (> or =66) reported using fewer pain treatments, including analgesic medications. Finally, those with (vs. those without) pain reported a greater number of medical and mental…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.862

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haskell, S. G., Heapy, A., Reid, M. C., Papas, R. K., & Kerns, R. D.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • VA Connecticut Healthcare System (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Venue
Journal of Women's Health
Published
2006-09
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
862-869
ISSN
  • 1059-7115 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9996
  • 1931-843X
OpenAlex
W1999994005
Cited by
79
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Women s Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
women veterans, chronic pain, pain prevalence, age differences, pain intensity, analgesic use, primary care, low back pain, lower limb pain, mental health visits, health care utilization
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Connecticut, Female, Health Status, Humans, Middle Aged, Pain, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Veterans, Women's Health Services, Prevalence, Women's Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review