Cited by 56Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementReproductive tract infections research

Acceptability and feasibility of human papilloma virus self-sampling for cervical cancer screening

Open access
Ilangovan, Kumar, Kobetz, Erin, Koru-Sengul, Tulay, Marcus, Erin N., Rodriguez, Brendaly, Alonzo, Yisel, Carrasquillo, Olveen·2016·Journal of Women's Health

Abstract

Objectives Women in safety-net institutions are less likely to receive cervical cancer screening. Human papilloma virus (HPV) self-sampling is an alternative method of cervical cancer screening. We examine the acceptability and feasibility of HPV self-sampling among patients and clinic staff in two safety-net clinics in Miami. Materials and methods Haitian and Latina women aged 30-65 years with no Pap smear in the past 3 years were recruited. Women were offered HPV self-sampling or traditional Pap smear screening. The acceptability of HPV self-sampling among patients and clinic staff was assessed. If traditional screening was preferred the medical record was reviewed. Results A total of 180 women were recruited (134 Latinas and 46 Haitian). HPV self-sampling was selected by 67% women. Among those selecting traditional screening, 22% were not screened 5 months postrecruitment. Over 80% of women agreed HPV self-sampling was faster, more private, easy to use, and would prefer to use again. Among clinic staff, 80% agreed they would be willing to incorporate HPV self-sampling into practice. Conclusions HPV self-sampling was both acceptable and feasible to participants and clinic staff and may help overcome barriers to screening.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jwh.2015.5469

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ilangovan, K., Kobetz, E., Koru-Sengul, T., Marcus, E. N., Rodriguez, B., Alonzo, Y., & Carrasquillo, O.
Affiliations
  • Florida International University (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Department of Public Health Sciences, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
  • Department of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Corresponding author
Carrasquillo, Olveen
Venue
Journal of Women's Health
Published
2016-09
Volume
25
Issue
9
Pages
944-951
ISSN
  • 1059-7115 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9996
  • 1931-843X
OpenAlex
W2277006279
Cited by
56
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Women s Health (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Miami
  • National Cancer Institute (U54CA153705)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
HPV self-sampling, cervical cancer screening, safety-net clinics, screening acceptability, screening feasibility, Haitian women, Hispanic women, barriers to screening, Pap smear
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Florida, Haiti, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Self Care, Specimen Handling, Vaginal Smears, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Early Detection of Cancer, Safety-net Providers, Papanicolaou Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review