Cited by 101Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumElder Abuse and Neglect

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Domestic Violence Enhanced Perinatal Home Visits: The DOVE Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perinatal intimate partner violence (IPV) is common and has significant negative health outcomes for mothers and infants. This study evaluated the effectiveness of an IPV intervention in reducing violence among abused women in perinatal home visiting programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This assessor-blinded multisite randomized control trial of 239 women experiencing perinatal IPV was conducted from 2006 to 2012 in U.S. urban and rural settings. The Domestic Violence Enhanced Home Visitation Program (DOVE) intervention group (n = 124) received a structured abuse assessment and six home visitor-delivered empowerment sessions integrated into home visits. All participants were screened for IPV and referred appropriately. IPV was measured by the Conflicts Tactics Scale2 at baseline through 24 months postpartum. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in IPV over time (F = 114.23; p < 0.001) from baseline to 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postpartum (all p < 0.001). Additional models examining change in IPV from baseline indicated a significant treatment effect (F = 6.45; p < 0.01). Women in the DOVE treatment group reported a larger mean decrease in IPV scores from baseline compared to women in the usual care group (mean decline 40.82 vs. 35.87). All models accounted for age and maternal depression as covariates. CONCLUSIONS: The DOVE intervention was effective in decreasing IPV and is brief, thereby facilitating its incorporation within well-woman and well-child care visits, as well as home visiting programs, while satisfying recommendations set forth in the Affordable Care Act for IPV screening and brief counseling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jwh.2015.5547

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 39 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dutton MA. Empowering and healing the battered women. New York: Springer 1992.
  2. Chamberlain L, , Levenson R. A guide for obstetric, gynecologic and reproductive health care settings, 2nd ed. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Position Statement, 2012. Available at: www.acog.org/-/media/Departments/Violence-Against-Women/Reproguidelines.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20151229T1441508783 Accessed December1, 2015.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sharps, P. W., Bullock, L. F., Campbell, J. C., Alhusen, J. L., Ghazarian, S. R., Bhandari, S. S., & Schminkey, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Wright State University (US)
Corresponding author
Sharps, Phyllis W.
Venue
Journal of Women s Health
Published
2016-05-20
Volume
25
Issue
11
Pages
1129-1138
ISSN
  • 1059-7115 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9996
  • 1931-843X
OpenAlex
W2407418872
Cited by
101
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3
FWCI
14.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Women s Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of Bioresource Management (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR009093)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Elder Abuse and Neglect
Keywords
intimate partner violence, domestic violence intervention, abuse assessment, postpartum violence, maternal depression, well-woman care, well-child care
MeSH terms
Intimate Partner Violence, Adolescent, Adult, Animals, Female, House Calls, Humans, Power, Psychological, Pregnancy, Rural Population, United States, Urban Population, Linear Models, Domestic Violence, Battered Women, Perinatal Care, Postpartum Period, Evidence-Based Practice, Young Adult, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review