The Effects of Intermittent Fasting on Glycemic Control and Body Composition in Adults with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of intermittent fasting on glycemic control and body composition in adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes. Although intermittent fasting has shown some promise in improving glucoregulatory indicators and body composition in adults with obesity, there is currently no systematic review evaluating these effects in adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes. A database search of PubMed, CINHAL, and MEDLINE identified five studies that met inclusion criterion. All studies were randomized controlled trials in adult subjects (n = 46–137) with type 2 diabetes and a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m2. Four different intermittent fasting regimens were reviewed. All fasting regimens revealed strong evidence to support intermittent fasting as a feasible diet to improve glycemia and body composition measures within 12–24 weeks. Follow-up 12–18 months after intermittent fasting did not show promising results for continued weight loss and improved glycemic control. The majority of the studies demonstrated insignificant differences between intermittent fasting and continuous energy restriction for measures of glycated hemoglobin a1c and body composition. More data on intermittent fasting in adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes are needed to determine its benefits within this patient population. Future research should include consistent fasting regimens and larger sample sizes to improve the reliability and generalizability of the data. Also, consistent follow-up after a fasting intervention may enhance long-term benefits and should be considered in future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The remaining two systematic reviews compared altered eating patterns with conventional energy-restricted diets.
“The remaining two systematic reviews compared altered eating patterns with conventional energy-restricted diets (ESM Table 13) [44, 45].”
Currently popular intermittent fasting was only captured in systematic reviews without meta-analysis (high-risk-of-bias RCTs).
“Currently popular intermittent fasting was only captured in systematic reviews without meta-analysis (high-risk-of-bias RCTs) [44, 45].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Vitale, R., & Kim, Y.
- Affiliations
- Central Michigan University (US)
- Nutrition and Dietetics, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, USA.
- Corresponding author
- Vitale, Rosemarie
- Venue
- Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-12-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 450-461
- ISSN
- 1540-4196 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8518
- OpenAlex
- W3048512261
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6
- FWCI
- 0.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- intermittent fasting, glycemic control, body composition, obesity, type 2 diabetes, HbA1c, weight loss, caloric restriction, long-term follow-up
- MeSH terms
- Glycemic Control, Blood Glucose, Body Composition, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Fasting, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Obesity, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Weight Loss, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Caloric Restriction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review