Cited by 33RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryDendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers

Formulation of biocompatible targeted ECO/siRNA nanoparticles with long-term stability for clinical translation of RNAi

Open access
Ayat, Nadia R., Sun, Zhanhu, Sun, Da, Yin, Michelle, Hall, Ryan C., Vaidya, Amita M., Liu, Xujie, Schilb, Andrew L. +2 more·2019·Nucleic Acid Therapeutics

Abstract

Nanoparticle based siRNA formulations often suffer from aggregation and loss of function during storage. We in this study report a frozen targeted RGD-polyethylene glycol (PEG)-ECO/siβ3 nanoparticle formulation with a prolonged shelf life and preserved nanoparticle functionality. The targeted RGD-PEG-ECO/siβ3 nanoparticles are formed by step-wised self-assembly of RGD-PEG-maleimide, ECO, and siRNA. The nanoparticles have a diameter of 224.5 ± 9.41 nm and a zeta potential to 45.96 ± 3.67 mV in water and a size of 234.34 ± 3.01 nm and a near neutral zeta potential in saline solution. The addition of sucrose does not affect their size and zeta potential and substantially preserves the integrity and biological activities of frozen and lyophilized formulations of the targeted nanoparticles. The frozen formulation with as low as 5% sucrose retains nanoparticle integrity (90% siRNA encapsulation), size distribution (polydispersity index [PDI] ≤20%), and functionality (at least 75% silencing efficiency) at -80°C for at least 1 year. The frozen RGD-PEG-ECO/siβ3 nanoparticle formulation exhibits excellent biocompatibility, with no adverse effects on hemocompatibility and minimal immunogenicity. As RNAi holds the promise in treating the previously untreatable diseases, the frozen nanoparticle formulation with the low sucrose concentration has the potential to be a delivery platform for clinical translation of RNAi therapeutics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/nat.2019.0784

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 33

Authors
Ayat, N. R., Sun, Z., Sun, D., Yin, M., Hall, R. C., Vaidya, A. M., Liu, X., Schilb, A. L., Scheidt, J. H., & Lu, Z.-R.
Affiliations
Case Western Reserve University (US)
Corresponding author
Lu, Zheng-Rong
Venue
Nucleic Acid Therapeutics
Published
2019-08-01
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
195-207
ISSN
  • 2159-3337 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-3345
OpenAlex
W2947271417
Cited by
33
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acid Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (HHSN261200800001C)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA194518, HHSN261200800001E), R01CA235152)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers
Keywords
siRNA nanoparticles, RNAi therapeutics, targeted nanoparticle delivery, freeze-drying, sucrose, nanoparticle stability, siRNA encapsulation, silencing efficiency, biocompatibility, hemocompatibility, immunogenicity, clinical translation
MeSH terms
Biocompatible Materials, Humans, Polyethylene Glycols, RNA, Double-Stranded, Drug Delivery Systems, RNA Interference, RNA, Small Interfering, Cell Line, Tumor, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review