The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Controlled Cortical Impact: A New Experimental Brain Injury Model
Abstract
A new experimental model of mechanical brain injury was produced in the laboratory ferret (Mustela putorius furo) using a stroke-constrained pneumatic impactor. Cortical impacts were made on vertex to the intact dura mater overlying the cerebral cortex with contact velocities ranging from 2.0 to 4.0 m/sec and with deformations of 2.0 to 5.0 mm. The dwell time of the impact and the stability of the skull during impact were verified with high speed (1000 to 3000 frames/sec) cineradiography. Systemic arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and respiration were monitored, and postinjury changes were recorded. Anatomic brain injury, including subdural hematoma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, tears or rents of the dura mater, and contusions of the cortex, brainstem, cervical spinal cord, and cerebellum was observed. Injury responses ranged from no apparent anatomic injury or alterations in the systemic physiology at low severity impact (2.0 m/sec, 2.0 mm) to immediate fatality in the highest severity impact groups (4.0 m/sec, 4.0 mm). The range of changes in systemic physiology and of pathology in the brain, brainstem, and spinal cord was a function of both contact velocity and the amount of brain deformation. In two cases where postinjury time was 8-10 h, diffuse axonal injury, indicated by beaded axons and retraction balls, was present in subcortical regions underlying the site of impact. The spectrum of anatomic injury and systemic physiologic responses closely resembled aspects of closed head injury seen clinically. This procedure complements and improves on existing techniques by allowing independent control of contact velocity and level of deformation of the brain to facilitate biomechanical and analytic modeling of brain trauma. Graded cortical contusions and subcortical injury are produced by precisely controlled brain deformations, thereby allowing questions to be addressed regarding the influence of contact velocity and level of deformation on the anatomic and functional severity of brain injury.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diffuse axonal injury in head injury: definition, diagnosis and grading
Adams, J. H., Doyle, D., Ford, I., Gennarelli, T. A., Graham, D. I., & Mclellan, D. R. (1989) · Histopathology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2559.1989.tb03040.x · Cited by 1,176
A controlled cortical impact model of traumatic brain injury in the rat
Edward Dixon, C., Clifton, G. L., Lighthall, J. W., Yaghmai, A. A., & Hayes, R. L. (1991) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/0165-0270(91)90104-8 · Cited by 1,141
Self-citationCernak, I. (2005) · NeuroRX · doi:10.1602/neurorx.2.3.410 · Cited by 462
SMITH, D. H., SOARES, H. D., PIERCE, J. S., PERLMAN, K. G., SAATMAN, K. E., MEANEY, D. F., DIXON, C. E., & McINTOSH, T. K. (1995) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.1995.12.169 · Cited by 451
Experimental models of traumatic brain injury: do we really need to build a better mousetrap?
Morales, D. M., Marklund, N., Lebold, D., Thompson, H. J., Pitkanen, A., Maxwell, W. L., Longhi, L., Laurer, H., Maegele, M., Neugebauer, E., et al. (2005) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.08.030 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- LIGHTHALL, J. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurotrauma
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1988-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-15
- ISSN
- 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9042
- OpenAlex
- W2061476401
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Controlled Cortical Impact: A New Experimental Brain Injury Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/neu.1988.5.1
- The paper
- LIGHTHALL, J. W. (1988). Controlled Cortical Impact: A New Experimental Brain Injury Model. Journal of Neurotrauma. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.1988.5.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.