Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neutrophil Accumulation After Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats: Comparison of Weight Drop and Controlled Cortical Impact Models

CLARK, ROBERT S.B., SCHIDING, JOANNE K., KACZOROWSKI, SUSAN L., MARION, DONALD W., KOCHANEK, PATRICK M.·1994·Journal of Neurotrauma

Abstract

Previous work in our laboratory and others using the weight drop (WD) model of traumatic brain injury (TBI) has shown that neutrophils accumulate in brain tissue during the initial 24 h posttrauma as measured by myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity and immunohistochemistry. This study compares the acute inflammatory response to TBI over time, as measured by MPO activity, in the WD and controlled cortical impact (CCI) models. Anesthetized adult Sprague-Dawley rats were traumatized using WD (10-g weight dropped 5 cm) or CCI (4 m/sec, 2.5 mm depth). At 2, 24, 48, or 168 h after trauma, rats (n = 4–5/group at each time) were anesthetized and killed, the brains were removed, and 6-mm coronal slices from traumatized and contralateral hemispheres were assayed for MPO activity. Nontraumatized rats (n = 4) served as controls. Three additional rats underwent a more severe CCI (3 mm depth) with MPO activity assayed at 24 h. A separate group of rats (n = 6) was subjected to WD trauma and killed at 2 weeks after injury for analysis of lesion volume. MPO activity in the traumatized hemisphere was demonstrated at 24 and 48 h in both the WD (0.3152 ± 0.0472 and 0.3017 ± 0.0228 U/g, respectively, p < 0.05 vs controls) and CCI (0.1866 ± 0.0225 and 0.1937 ± 0.0772 U/g, respectively, p < 0.05 vs controls) models. MPO activity was below the sensitivity of the assay in the control, 2 h, and 168 h groups in both models. MPO activity at 24 h after CCI increased with the depth of injury (0.1866 ± 0.0225 vs 0.3011 ± 0.0141 U/g, 2.5 vs 3.0 mm depth, respectively, p < 0.05). Lesion volume at 2 weeks after WD trauma was 16.0 ± 2.7 mm3,17.5% larger than lesion volume after CCI (previously published data), but the difference between groups was not statistically significant. These data indicate that (1) MPO activity after traumatic brain injury is increased at 24 and 48 h and resolves by 168 h in both the WD and CCI models, and (2) MPO activity in the CCI model increases with the severity of trauma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/neu.1994.11.499

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 291

Metadata

Authors
CLARK, R. S. B., SCHIDING, J. K., KACZOROWSKI, S. L., MARION, D. W., & KOCHANEK, P. M.
Venue
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
1994-10
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
499-506
ISSN
  • 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9042
OpenAlex
W1987467195
Cited by
291
References
1
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neutrophil Accumulation After Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats: Comparison of Weight Drop and Controlled Cortical Impact Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/neu.1994.11.499
The paper
CLARK, R. S. B., SCHIDING, J. K., KACZOROWSKI, S. L., MARION, D. W., & KOCHANEK, P. M. (1994). Neutrophil Accumulation After Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats: Comparison of Weight Drop and Controlled Cortical Impact Models. Journal of Neurotrauma. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.1994.11.499

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.