The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Sensitive and Reliable Locomotor Rating Scale for Open Field Testing in Rats
Abstract
Behavioral assessment after spinal cord contusion has long focused on open field locomotion using modifications of a rating scale developed by Tarlov and Klinger (1954). However, on-going modifications by several groups have made interlaboratory comparison of locomotor outcome measures difficult. The purpose of the present study was to develop an efficient, expanded, and unambiguous locomotor rating scale to standardize locomotor outcome measures across laboratories. Adult rats (n = 85) were contused at T7-9 cord level with an electromagnetic or weight drop device. Locomotor behavior was evaluated before injury, on the first or second postoperative day, and then for up to 10 weeks. Scoring categories and attributes were identified, operationally defined, and ranked based on the observed sequence of locomotor recovery patterns. These categories formed the Basso, Beattie, Bresnahan (BBB) Locomotor Rating Scale. The data indicate that the BBB scale is a valid and predictive measure of locomotor recovery able to distinguish behavioral outcomes due to different injuries and to predict anatomical alterations at the lesion center. Interrater reliability tests indicate that examiners with widely varying behavioral testing experience can apply the scale consistently and obtain similar scores. The BBB Locomotor Rating Scale offers investigators a more discriminating measure of behavioral outcome to evaluate treatments after spinal cord injury.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We confirmed paraplegia 2 days after the surgery using the Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan locomotion score (BBB scale; [26]). Any animal with s BBB value above 7 was excluded from subsequent analyses.”
From MicroRNA-138-5p Targets Pro-Apoptotic Factors and Favors Neural Cell Survival: Analysis in the Injured Spinal Cord (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 1987, Barbeau & Rossignol, 1989
- 10.1016/0006-8993(87)91442-9 · DOI
- BASSO D.M., 1993, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 19, 541
- BASSO D.M., 1994, J. Neurotrauma, 11, 103
- BASSO D.M., 1994, Restor. Neurol. Rehabil., 7, 95
- BEATTIE M.S., 1989, M. Brown and M.E. Goldberger (eds.). American Paralysis Association: Springfield, NJ, 16
- 10.1089/neu.1992.9.197 · DOI
- 10.1006/exnr.1993.1028 · DOI
- 10.1006/exnr.1994.1042 · DOI
- 10.1016/0014-4886(87)90299-8 · DOI
- 10.3171/jns.1994.80.1.0097 · DOI
- 10.1016/0014-2999(83)90487-9 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1984.tb10074.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1980.tb06534.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0014-4886(85)90118-9 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00248226 · DOI
- 10.1016/0014-4886(90)90149-M · DOI
- 10.1089/neu.1992.9.123 · DOI
- 10.1089/neu.1992.9.177 · DOI
- 10.1016/0014-4886(92)90174-O · DOI
- 10.1002/cne.901580103 · DOI
- 10.1089/cns.1987.4.149 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00238857 · DOI
- 10.1016/0014-4886(91)90036-C · DOI
- 10.1089/neu.1992.9.187 · DOI
- 10.1001/archneurpsyc.1954.02320390001001 · DOI
- VIERCK C.J., 1989, M. Brown and M.E. Goldberger (eds). American Paralysis Association: Springfield, NJ, 41
- WRATHALL J.R., 1989, M. Brown and M.E. Goldberger (eds.). American Paralysis Association: Springfield, NJ, 26
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions.
Gatchel, R. J., Peng, Y. B., Peters, M. L., Fuchs, P. N., & Turk, D. C. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.581 · Cited by 3,392
Modulation of the proteoglycan receptor PTPσ promotes recovery after spinal cord injury
Lang, B. T., Cregg, J. M., DePaul, M. A., Tran, A. P., Xu, K., Dyck, S. M., Madalena, K. M., Brown, B. P., Weng, Y.-L., Li, S., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13974 · Cited by 465
Guo, S., Perets, N., Betzer, O., Ben-Shaul, S., Sheinin, A., Michaelevski, I., Popovtzer, R., Offen, D., & Levenberg, S. (2019) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b01892 · Cited by 424
Niemann-Pick type C disease involves disrupted neurosteroidogenesis and responds to allopregnanolone
Griffin, L. D., Gong, W., Verot, L., & Mellon, S. H. (2004) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1073 · Cited by 395
Führmann, T., Tam, R. Y., Ballarin, B., Coles, B., Elliott Donaghue, I., van der Kooy, D., Nagy, A., Tator, C. H., Morshead, C. M., & Shoichet, M. S. (2016) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.12.032 · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Authors
- BASSO, D. M., BEATTIE, M. S., & BRESNAHAN, J. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurotrauma
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-21
- ISSN
- 0897-7151
- 1557-9042
- Cited by
- 3,963
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review