Cited by 342Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

Topography of axonal injury as defined by amyloid precursor protein and the sector scoring method in mild and severe closed head injury

BLUMBERGS, PETER C., SCOTT, GRACE, VIS, JIM MANA, WAINWRIGHT, HELEN, SIMPSON, DONALD A., McLEAN, A. JACK·1995·Journal of Neurotrauma

Abstract

Axonal injury (AI), as defined by amyloid precursor protein (APP) positive axonal swellings, was recorded on a series of line diagrams of standard brain sections divided into 116 sectors to provide an Axonal Injury Sector Score (AISS) ranging from 0 to 116. This sector scoring method of recording axonal damage and providing a topographic overview of AI was applied to a series of 6 mild head injury cases [Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 13-15] and six severe head injury cases (GCS 3-8). The AISS ranged from 4 to 107 overall and varied from 4 to 88 in the mildly injured group and 76 to 107 in the severe head injury group, supporting the concept that there is a spectrum of AI in traumatic head injury and that the AISS is a measure of the extent of AI. APP immunostaining demonstrated positive axonal swellings 1.75 h after head injury and analysis of the pattern of AI in the mild and severe head injury groups showed that axons were more vulnerable than blood vessels and that the axons in the corpus callosum and fornices were the most vulnerable of all.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/neu.1995.12.565

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • APP accumulates in traumatized axons after all severities of TBI and has been detected many months post-injury.

    “For example, APP accumulates in traumatized axons after all severities of TBI and has been detected many months post-injury (129–131).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BLUMBERGS, P. C., SCOTT, G., VIS, J. M., WAINWRIGHT, H., SIMPSON, D. A., & McLEAN, A. J.
Affiliations
South Australia Pathology (AU)
Venue
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
1995-08
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
565-572
ISSN
  • 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9042
OpenAlex
W2029934068
Cited by
342
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 18
FWCI
5.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurotrauma (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Adelaide
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Keywords
axonal injury, amyloid precursor protein, axonal swellings, closed head injury, mild traumatic brain injury, severe traumatic brain injury, corpus callosum, fornix, immunostaining
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Axons, Child, Female, Craniocerebral Trauma, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Middle Aged, Glasgow Coma Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review