Cited by 121Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Cortical Cholinergic Dysfunction After Human Head Injury

MURDOCH, I., PERRY, E.K., COURT, J.A., GRAHAM, D.I., DEWAR, D.·1998·Journal of Neurotrauma

Abstract

Loss of cholinergic neurotransmission is implicated in memory impairment and cognitive dysfunction after head injury. The aim of the present study was to investigate presynaptic markers, particularly in relation to cholinergic neurotransmission in human postmortem brain from patients who died following a head injury and age-matched controls. Choline acetyltransferase activity and high-affinity nicotinic receptor binding sites were assayed in the inferior temporal gyrus, cingulate gyrus, and superior parietal cortex of 16 head-injured patients and 8 controls. Synaptophysin immunoreactivity was determined in the left cingulate gyrus from the same patient groups. In the head-injured group, choline acetyltransferase activity was consistently reduced in each cortical region compared to control subjects. The presence of a subdural haematoma and a prolonged survival period after head injury tended to be associated with lower choline acetyltransferase activity. In contrast to the marked reduction in choline acetyltransferase activity, nicotine receptor binding was unchanged in head-injured compared to control patients. Synaptophysin immunoreactivity in the cingulate gyrus was reduced by approximately 30% (p < 0.05) in the head-injured group compared to controls. Correlation of choline acetyltransferase activity with synaptophysin immunoreactivity indicated there is a deficit of cholinergic presynaptic terminals in postmortem human brain following head injury.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/neu.1998.15.295

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 39 · Cited by 121

Authors
MURDOCH, I., PERRY, E. K., COURT, J. A., GRAHAM, D. I., & DEWAR, D.
Affiliations
University of Glasgow (GB)
Venue
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
1998-05
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
295-305
ISSN
  • 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9042
OpenAlex
W1999839898
Cited by
121
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurotrauma (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, cholinergic dysfunction, choline acetyltransferase, synaptophysin, presynaptic terminals, subdural hematoma, cingulate gyrus, inferior temporal gyrus, superior parietal cortex, postmortem brain, memory impairment, cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Injuries, Bungarotoxins, Cerebral Cortex, Brain Ischemia, Choline O-Acetyltransferase, Cholinergic Fibers, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Hematoma, Subdural, Humans, Iodine Radioisotopes, Male, Middle Aged, Synaptic Transmission, Nicotine, Parietal Lobe, Radioligand Assay, Receptors, Nicotinic, Temporal Lobe, Tritium, Immunoblotting, Synaptophysin, Nicotinic Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review