Cited by 2,386Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTrauma and Emergency Care Studies

Structured Interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: Guidelines for Their Use

WILSON, J.T. LINDSAY, PETTIGREW, LAURA E.L., TEASDALE, GRAHAM M.·1998·Journal of Neurotrauma

Abstract

The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) is the most widely used outcome measure after traumatic brain injury, but it is increasingly recognized to have important limitations. It is proposed that shortcomings of the GOS can be addressed by adopting a standard format for the interview used to assign outcome. A set of guidelines are outlined that are directed at the main problems encountered in applying the GOS. The guidelines cover the general principles underlying the use of the GOS and common practical problems of applying the scale. Structured interview schedules are described for both the five-point GOS and an extended eight-point GOS (GOSE). An interrater reliability study of the structured interviews for the GOS and GOSE yielded weighted kappa values of 0.89 and 0.85, respectively. It is concluded that assessment of the GOS using a standard format with a written protocol is practical and reliable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/neu.1998.15.573

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 2,386

Authors
WILSON, J. T. L., PETTIGREW, L. E. L., & TEASDALE, G. M.
Venue
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
1998-08
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
573-585
ISSN
  • 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9042
OpenAlex
W1972491904
Cited by
2,386
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 100 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 134 · 2023: 142 · 2022: 147 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 150 · 2019: 133 · 2018: 107 · 2017: 115 · 2016: 94 · 2015: 92 · 2014: 94 · 2013: 91 · 2012: 90
FWCI
9.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurotrauma (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Keywords
Glasgow Outcome Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, traumatic brain injury, outcome measurement, inter-rater reliability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Disability Evaluation, Female, Craniocerebral Trauma, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Glasgow Coma Scale, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review