Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Early Predictors of Mortality and Morbidity After Severe Closed Head Injury

LANNOO, ENGELIEN, Van RIETVELDE, FREDERIK, COLARDYN, FRANCIS, LEMMERLING, MARK, VANDEKERCKHOVE, TOM, JANNES, CONSTANTIJN, De SOETE, GEERT·2000·Journal of Neurotrauma

Abstract

Mortality and morbidity of 158 patients with severe head injury were studied in relation to age, and early (24-h) clinical and computed tomography data. For comparison of outcome data in survivors, a group of 32 patients with traumatic injuries to parts of the body other than the head was used as controls. Within the head-injured group, the mortality rate was 51%. Logistic regression analyses combined 13 out of 16 predictors into a model with an accuracy of 93%, a sensitivity of 90%, and a specificity of 95%. These include age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, pupillary reactivity, blood pressure, intracranial pressure, blood glucose, platelet count, body temperature, cerebral lactate, and subdural, intracranial, subarachnoid, and ventricular hemorrhage. At 6 months postinjury, head-injury survivors and trauma controls were evaluated with the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), a neuropsychological test battery and the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP). Head-injury survivors had a higher proportion of disabilities and neuropsychological dysfunctions than trauma controls. They also report more quality of life-related functional limitations on the SIP scales for mobility, intellectual behavior, communication, home management, eating, and work. Linear regression analysis resulted in age being the only important predictor of outcome on the GOS, the GCS score being the best predictor of neuropsychological functioning, and pupillary reactivity being the most predictive for self-reported quality of life as measured by SIP. Those factors important for predicting mortality (clinical variables such as ICP or blood glucose level, and CT observations) failed to show any significant relationship with morbidity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/neu.2000.17.403

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 183

Metadata

Authors
LANNOO, E., Van RIETVELDE, F., COLARDYN, F., LEMMERLING, M., VANDEKERCKHOVE, T., JANNES, C., & De SOETE, G.
Venue
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
2000-05
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
403-414
ISSN
  • 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9042
OpenAlex
W1976928781
Cited by
183
References
2
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early Predictors of Mortality and Morbidity After Severe Closed Head Injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/neu.2000.17.403
The paper
LANNOO, E., Van RIETVELDE, F., COLARDYN, F., LEMMERLING, M., VANDEKERCKHOVE, T., JANNES, C., & De SOETE, G. (2000). Early Predictors of Mortality and Morbidity After Severe Closed Head Injury. Journal of Neurotrauma. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2000.17.403

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.