Translational Neurochemical Research in Acute Human Brain Injury: The Current Status and Potential Future for Cerebral Microdialysis
Abstract
Microdialysis (MD) was introduced as an intracerebral sampling method for clinical neurosurgery by Hillered et al. and Meyerson et al. in 1990. Since then MD has been embraced as a research tool to measure the neurochemistry of acute human brain injury and epilepsy. In general investigators have focused their attention to relative chemical changes during neurointensive care, operative procedures, and epileptic seizure activity. This initial excitement surrounding this technology has subsided over the years due to concerns about the amount of tissue sampled and the complicated issues related to quantification. The interpretation of mild to moderate MD fluctuations in general remains an issue relating to dynamic changes of the architecture and size of the interstitial space, blood-brain barrier (BBB) function, and analytical imprecision, calling for additional validation studies and new methods to control for in vivo recovery variations. Consequently, the use of this methodology to influence clinical decisions regarding the care of patients has been restricted to a few institutions. Clinical studies have provided ample evidence that intracerebral MD monitoring is useful for the detection of overt adverse neurochemical conditions involving hypoxia/ischemia and seizure activity in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), traumatic brain injury (TBI), thromboembolic stroke, and epilepsy. There is some data strongly suggesting that MD changes precede the onset of secondary neurological deter…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Urea has been utilized as an independent measure of probe function and recovery in both human and animal brain microdialysis studies.
“Since the metabolite urea has been utilized as an independent measure of probe function and recovery in both human and animal brain microdialysis studies (34-37)”
From Human ApoE isoforms differentially regulate brain amyloid-β peptide clearance (2011) · cites this paper as [35]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 270 · Cited by 365
- Authors
- Hillered, L., Vespa, P. M., & Hovda, D. A.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Neurotrauma
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-41
- ISSN
- 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9042
- OpenAlex
- W2031375851
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 270
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 17.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurotrauma (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P50NS030308, NS-27544, R01NS027544, NS 30308)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Keywords
- cerebral microdialysis, acute brain injury, neurochemistry, blood-brain barrier dysfunction, subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, stroke, epilepsy, hypoxia-ischemia, lactate, glucose metabolism, amino acids, excitotoxicity, reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide, intracranial pressure, neurocritical care
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Brain Injuries, Humans, Biomarkers, Microdialysis, Neurosurgical Procedures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review