IMPACT Database of Traumatic Brain Injury: Design And Description
Abstract
The objective of this report is to describe the design and content of the International Mission for Prognosis And Clinical Trial (IMPACT) database of traumatic brain injury which contains the complete dataset from most clinical trials and organized epidemiologic studies conducted over the past 20 years. This effort, funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health, has led to the accumulation thus far of data from 9205 patients with severe and moderate brain injuries from eight randomized placebo controlled trials and three observational studies. Data relevant to the design and analysis of pragmatic Phase III clinical trials, including pre-hospital, admission, and post-resuscitation assessments, information on the acute management, and short- and long-term outcome were merged into a top priority data set (TPDS). The major emphasis during the first phase of study is on information from time of injury to post-resuscitation and outcome at 6 months thereby providing a unique resource for prognostic analysis and for studies aimed at optimizing the design and analysis of Phase III trials in traumatic brain injury.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clinical databases such as TRACK-TBI, FITBIR, and IMPACT that serve as integrated repositories for multi-dimensional outcome assessments, genomic/proteomic data, neuroimaging and blood biomarkers for civilian, sports, and military TBI are becoming important tools in evaluating the impact of sex on TBI outcomes and experimental treatments.
“Clinical databases such as TRACK-TBI, FITBIR, and IMPACT that serve as integrated repositories for multi-dimensional outcome assessments, genomic/proteomic data, neuroimaging and blood biomarkers for civilian, sports, and military TBI are becoming important tools in evaluating the impact of sex on TBI outcomes and experimental treatments. 112-114”
From Sex Differences in Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Should Know (2019) · cites this paper as [114]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 236
- Authors
- Marmarou, A., Lu, J., Butcher, I., McHugh, G. S., Mushkudiani, N. A., Murray, G. D., Steyerberg, E. W., & Maas, A. I. R.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical School, Richmond, Virginia.
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Venue
- Journal of Neurotrauma
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 239-250
- ISSN
- 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9042
- OpenAlex
- W2020427028
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 8.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurotrauma (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Virginia Commonwealth University
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS042691, NS 042691)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
- Keywords
- traumatic brain injury, severe traumatic brain injury, moderate traumatic brain injury, clinical trial registries, prognostic assessment, phase III clinical trial design, acute management, short- and long-term outcomes, observational studies
- MeSH terms
- Brain Injuries, Humans, Prognosis, Research Design, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Databases, Factual, Empirical Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review