Combination therapies for traumatic brain injury: prospective considerations
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) initiates a cascade of numerous pathophysiological events that evolve over time.Despite the complexity of TBI, research aimed at therapy development has almost exclusively focused on single therapies, all of which have failed in multicenter clinical trials.Therefore, in February 2008 the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, with support from the National Institute of Child Health and Development, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and the Department of Veterans Affairs, convened a workshop to discuss the opportunities and challenges of testing combination therapies for TBI.Workshop participants included clinicians and scientists from a variety of disciplines, institutions, and agencies.The objectives of the workshop were to: (1) identify the most promising combinations of therapies for TBI; (2) identify challenges of testing combination therapies in clinical and pre-clinical studies; and (3) propose research methodologies and study designs to overcome these challenges.Several promising combination therapies were discussed, but no one combination was identified as being the most promising.Rather, the general recommendation was to combine agents with complementary targets and effects (e.g., mechanisms and time-points), rather than focusing on a single target with multiple agents.In addition, it was recommended that clinical management guidelines be carefully considered when designing pre-clinical studies for therapeut…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Each animal model reflects a specific type of TBI and does not fully recapitulate primary and secondary damage evident in human TBI, resulting in restricted translation.
“This strategy presents additional challenges as each animal model reflects a specific type of TBI and does not fully recapitulate primary and secondary damage evident in human TBI (45) resulting in restricted translation (46).”
From The Inflammatory Continuum of Traumatic Brain Injury and Alzheimer’s Disease (2018) · cites this paper as [46]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 146 · Cited by 22
- Authors
- Margulies, S. S., & Hicks, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Neurotrauma
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-02-09
- Pages
- 090330061141047
- ISSN
- 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9042
- OpenAlex
- W4240252641
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 146
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurotrauma (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
- Keywords
- traumatic brain injury, combination therapy, drug repurposing, clinical trial design, therapeutic target, biomarkers, outcome measures, clinical management guidelines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review