Cited by 41Health disparities and outcomesPublic Health and Social InequalitiesMedical Coding and Health Information

Provider Perspectives on the Collection of Social Determinants of Health

Open access
Palacio, Ana, Seo, David, Medina, Heidy, Singh, Vivek, Suarez, Maritza, Tamariz, Leonardo·2018·Population Health Management

Abstract

Social determinants of health (SDH) impact health outcomes. Medical centers have begun to collect SDH data, urged by government and scientific entities. Provider perspectives on collecting SDH are unknown. The aim is to understand differences in views and preferences according to provider characteristics. A cross-sectional survey of University of Miami clinical faculty was conducted in late 2016. The survey contained 11 questions: 8 demographic and departmental responsibilities questions and 3 Likert scale questions to capture collection and use of SDH perspectives. The main outcome was whether providers thought the benefit of collecting SDH outweighs the burden and risks. In all, 240 faculty members were included. The majority were men (64%), with a mean age of 51 years. Among participants, 53.5% were non-Hispanic white, 32% were Hispanic, 5% were Black/African American, and 5% were Asian. The majority agreed that SDH are important predictors of health outcomes and quality of care (83%). When comparing minority to nonminority faculty, 25% believed that SDH should only be available to PCPs, compared to 8% of nonminorities ( P < 0.01). In a multivariate model, belonging to a racial ethnic minority was the only characteristic associated with believing that benefits of collecting SDH outweigh the risks (odds ratio 1.87, 95% confidence interval 1.02- 3.5) after adjusting for age, sex, minority status, health care provider type, type of responsibilities, and department. This study reveals that although most providers of a health system believe social risks impact health outcomes and quality metrics, the buy-in to collect SDH varies according to the racial/ethnic composition of the faculty.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/pop.2017.0166

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palacio, A., Seo, D., Medina, H., Singh, V., Suarez, M., & Tamariz, L.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Palacio, Ana
Venue
Population Health Management
Published
2018-11-28
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
501-508
ISSN
  • 1942-7891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-7905
OpenAlex
W2794969238
Cited by
41
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Population Health Management (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Vanderbilt University
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002736)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (U54MD010722)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
social determinants of health, provider perspectives, data collection, racial and ethnic minorities, quality of care, health outcomes, medical faculty, primary care access
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Cross-Sectional Studies, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Male, Physicians, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome, Electronic Health Records, Social Determinants of Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review