The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Engineered Osteochondral Grafts Using Biphasic Composite Solid Free-Form Fabricated Scaffolds
Open accessAbstract
Tissue engineering has provided an alternative to traditional strategies to repair cartilage damaged by injury or degenerative disease. A successful strategy to engineer osteochondral tissue will mimic the natural contour of the articulating surface, achieve native mechanical properties and functional load-bearing ability, and lead to integration with host cartilage and underlying subchondral bone. Image-based design (IBD) and solid free-form (SFF) fabrication can be used to generate scaffolds that are load bearing and match articular geometry. The objective of this study was to utilize materials and biological factors in an integrated approach to regenerate a multitissue interface. Biphasic composite scaffolds manufactured by IBD and SFF fabrication were used to simultaneously generate bone and cartilage in discrete regions and provide for the development of a stable interface between cartilage and subchondral bone. Poly-L-lactic acid/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds were differentially seeded with fibroblasts transduced with an adenovirus expressing bone morphogenetic protein 7 (BMP-7) in the ceramic phase and fully differentiated chondrocytes in the polymeric phase. After subcutaneous implantation into mice, the biphasic scaffolds promoted the simultaneous growth of bone, cartilage, and a mineralized interface tissue. Within the ceramic phase, the pockets of tissue generated included blood vessels, marrow stroma, and adipose tissue. This combination of IBD and SFF-fabricated biphasic scaffolds with gene and cell therapy is a promising approach to regenerate osteochondral defects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biomaterials for bone tissue engineering
Stevens, M. M. (2008) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/s1369-7021(08)70086-5 · Cited by 1,202
Degenerative Disorders of the Temporomandibular Joint: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment
Tanaka, E., Detamore, M. S., & Mercuri, L. G. (2008) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/154405910808700406 · Cited by 934
Current trends in the design of scaffolds for computer-aided tissue engineering
Giannitelli, S. M., Accoto, D., Trombetta, M., & Rainer, A. (2014) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.024 · Cited by 451
Oliveira, J. M., Rodrigues, M. T., Silva, S. S., Malafaya, P. B., Gomes, M. E., Viegas, C. A., Dias, I. R., Azevedo, J. T., Mano, J. F., & Reis, R. L. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.034 · Cited by 448
Murphy, M. K., MacBarb, R. F., Wong, M. E., & Athanasiou, K. A. (2013) · The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants · doi:10.11607/jomi.te20 · Cited by 405
Metadata
- Authors
- Schek, R. M., Taboas, J. M., Segvich, S. J., Hollister, S. J., & Krebsbach, P. H.
- Venue
- Tissue Engineering
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 9-10
- Pages
- 1376-1385
- ISSN
- 1076-3279 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8690
- OpenAlex
- W2061672809
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineered Osteochondral Grafts Using Biphasic Composite Solid Free-Form Fabricated Scaffolds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/ten.2004.10.1376
- The paper
- Schek, R. M., Taboas, J. M., Segvich, S. J., Hollister, S. J., & Krebsbach, P. H. (2004). Engineered Osteochondral Grafts Using Biphasic Composite Solid Free-Form Fabricated Scaffolds. Tissue Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2004.10.1376
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.