The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrical Stimulation of Nerve Cells Using Conductive Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Nerve Tissue Engineering
Abstract
Fabrication of scaffolds with suitable chemical, mechanical, and electrical properties is critical for the success of nerve tissue engineering. Electrical stimulation was directly applied to electrospun conductive nanofibrous scaffolds to enhance the nerve regeneration process. In the present study, electrospun conductive nanofibers were prepared by mixing 10 and 15 wt% doped polyaniline (PANI) with poly (epsilon-caprolactone)/gelatin (PG) (70:30) solution (PANI/PG) by electrospinning. The fiber diameter, pore size, hydrophilicity, tensile properties, conductivity, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy spectra of nanofibers were determined, and the in vitro biodegradability of the different nanofibrous scaffolds was also evaluated. Nanofibrous scaffolds containing 15% PANI was found to exhibit the most balanced properties to meet all the required specifications for electrical stimulation for its enhanced conductivity and is used for in vitro culture and electrical stimulation of nerve stem cells. 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) assay and scanning electron microscopy results showed that conductive nanofibrous scaffolds are suitable substrates for the attachment and proliferation of nerve stem cells. Electrical stimulation through conductive nanofibrous PANI/PG scaffolds showed enhanced cell proliferation and neurite outgrowth compared to the PANI/PG scaffolds that were not subjected to electrical stimulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conducting polymers in biomedical engineering
Guimard, N. K., Gomez, N., & Schmidt, C. E. (2007) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.012 · Cited by 1,599
Cited by
Conducting Polymers for Tissue Engineering
Guo, B., & Ma, P. X. (2018) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00276 · Cited by 835
Ghasemi-Mobarakeh, L., Prabhakaran, M. P., Morshed, M., Nasr-Esfahani, M. H., Baharvand, H., Kiani, S., Al-Deyab, S. S., & Ramakrishna, S. (2011) · Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1002/term.383 · Cited by 698
Self-citationVijayavenkataraman, S. (2020) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.02.003 · Cited by 556
Organ-on-a-chip platforms: a convergence of advanced materials, cells, and microscale technologies
Ahadian, S., Civitarese, R., Bannerman, D., Mohammadi, M. H., Lu, R., Wang, E., Davenport‐Huyer, L., Lai, B., Zhang, B., Zhao, Y., et al. (2018) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201700506 · Cited by 315
Visual prosthesis: interfacing stimulating electrodes with retinal neurons to restore vision.
Barriga-Rivera, A., Bareket, L., Goding, J., Aregueta-Robles, U. A., & Suaning, G. J. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00620 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghasemi-Mobarakeh, L., Prabhakaran, M. P., Morshed, M., Nasr-Esfahani, M. H., & Ramakrishna, S.
- Venue
- Tissue Engineering Part A
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3605-3619
- ISSN
- 1937-3341 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-335X
- OpenAlex
- W2066303539
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrical Stimulation of Nerve Cells Using Conductive Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Nerve Tissue Engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0689
- The paper
- Ghasemi-Mobarakeh, L., Prabhakaran, M. P., Morshed, M., Nasr-Esfahani, M. H., & Ramakrishna, S. (2009). Electrical Stimulation of Nerve Cells Using Conductive Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Nerve Tissue Engineering. Tissue Engineering Part A. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0689
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.