Cited by 61Muscle Physiology and DisordersTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineWound Healing and Treatments

The Effect of Mechanical Loading Upon Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffold-Mediated Skeletal Muscle Remodeling

Open access
Dziki, Jenna L., Giglio, Ross M., Sicari, Brian M., Wang, Derek S., Gandhi, Riddhi M., Londono, Ricardo, Dearth, Christopher L., Badylak, Stephen F.·2018·Tissue Engineering Part A

Abstract

Mounting evidence suggests that site-appropriate loading of implanted extracellular matrix (ECM) bioscaffolds and the surrounding microenvironment is an important tissue remodeling determinant, although the role at the cellular level in ECM-mediated skeletal muscle remodeling remains unknown. This study evaluates crosstalk between progenitor cells and macrophages during mechanical loading in ECM-mediated skeletal muscle repair. Myoblasts were exposed to solubilized ECM bioscaffolds and were mechanically loaded at 10% strain, 1 Hz for 5 h. Conditioned media was collected and applied to bone marrow-derived macrophages followed by immunolabeling for proinflammatory M1-like markers and proremodeling M2-like markers. Macrophages were subjected to the same loading protocol and their secreted products were collected for myoblast migration, proliferation, and differentiation analysis. A mouse hind limb unloading volumetric muscle loss model was used to evaluate the effect of loading upon the skeletal muscle microenvironment after ECM implantation. Animals were sacrificed at 14 or 180 days. Isometric torque production was tested and tissue sections were immunolabeled for macrophage phenotype and muscle fiber content. Results show that loading augments the ability of myoblasts to promote an M2-like macrophage phenotype following exposure to ECM bioscaffolds. Mechanically loaded macrophages promote myoblast chemotaxis and differentiation. Lack of weight bearing impaired muscle remodeling as indicated by Masson's Trichrome stain. Isometric torque was significantly increased following ECM implantation when compared to controls, a response not present in the hind limb-unloaded group. This work provides an important mechanistic insight of the effects of rehabilitation upon ECM-mediated remodeling and could have broader implications in clinical practice, advocating multidisciplinary approaches to regenerative medicine, emphasizing rehabilitation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/ten.tea.2017.0011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unlike synthetic implants, ECM bioscaffolds interact dynamically with host cells and promote constructive tissue remodeling.

    “Unlike synthetic materials, which often elicit chronic inflammation or fibrotic encapsulation [3,4], ECM bioscaffolds engage with host cells in a dynamic manner, facilitating constructive healing [5].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 61

Authors
Dziki, J. L., Giglio, R. M., Sicari, B. M., Wang, D. S., Gandhi, R. M., Londono, R., Dearth, C. L., & Badylak, S. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Badylak, Stephen F.
Venue
Tissue Engineering Part A
Published
2018-01
Volume
24
Issue
1-2
Pages
34-46
ISSN
  • 1937-3341 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-335X
OpenAlex
W2609035751
Cited by
61
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tissue Engineering Part A (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
Keywords
skeletal muscle remodeling, mechanical loading, macrophage polarization, M2 macrophages, myogenesis, hindlimb unloading, muscle regeneration, rehabilitation, muscle torque, conditioned medium
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cell Line, Cells, Cultured, Extracellular Matrix, Macrophages, Muscle, Skeletal, Myoblasts, Regenerative Medicine, Mice, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review