Matrix Bound Nanovesicles Have Tissue-Specific Characteristics That Suggest a Regulatory Role
Abstract
Recent studies have identified an extracellular vesicle population that is tightly anchored within the extracellular matrix (ECM) of tissues and organs until released by matrix turnover events. Evidence suggests that these matrix-bound nanovesicles (MBVs) are a ubiquitous component of the ECM, raising questions regarding their tissue-specific identity and their biologic function(s). The primary objective of this study was to examine MBVs isolated from six different tissues and compare their physical and compositional characteristics to determine the common and differentially expressed features. Accordingly, the results of this characterization show that while MBVs are a ubiquitous component of the ECM, they contain a protein and microRNA cargo that is tissue specific. The results furthermore suggest that MBVs have an important role in regulating tissue homeostasis. Matrix-bound nanovesicles (MBVs) are a subpopulation of extracellular vesicles tightly anchored within the extracellular matrix (ECM). They appear to be a ubiquitous component of the ECM and contain a protein and microRNA (miRNA) cargo that is specific to the source tissue/organ of origin. These results suggest that MBVs have an important role in regulating tissue remodeling and tissue homeostasis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Independently of the methodology used to decellularize the ECM, all decellularized tissue has shown MBV to date.
“Interestingly, independently of the methodology used to decellularize the ECM, all decellularized tissue has shown MBV to date, proving the resilience of the MBV and the tight ECM-MBV relationship [163,166,167].”
From Immune Response to Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds: A Comprehensive Review (2025) · cites this paper as [167]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 32
- Authors
- Turner, N. J., Quijano, L. M., Hussey, G. S., Jiang, P., & Badylak, S. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Cleveland State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Badylak, Stephen F.
- Venue
- Tissue Engineering Part A
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2022-11-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 21-22
- Pages
- 879-892
- ISSN
- 1937-3341 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-335X
- OpenAlex
- W4292466398
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Tissue Engineering Part A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Caveolin-1 and cellular processes
- Keywords
- extracellular vesicles, extracellular matrix, microRNA, protein cargo, tissue homeostasis, tissue remodeling, matrix turnover
- MeSH terms
- Extracellular Vesicles, Cell Communication, Extracellular Matrix, Phagocytosis, Extracellular Matrix Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review