Cited by 41Extracellular vesicles in diseaseMesenchymal stem cell researchBone Tissue Engineering Materials

Exosomes: a tool for bone tissue engineering

Open access
Huber, Julika, Griffin, Michelle F., Longaker, Michael T., Quarto, Natalina·2022·Tissue Engineering Part B Reviews

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been repeatedly shown to be a valuable source for cell-based therapy in regenerative medicine, including bony tissue repair. However, engraftment at the injury site is poor. Recently, it has been suggested that MSCs and other cells act through a paracrine signaling mechanism. Exosomes are nanostructures that have been implicated in this process. They carry DNA, RNA, proteins, and lipids and play an important role in cell-to-cell communication directly modulating their target cell at a transcriptional level. In a bone microenvironment, they have been shown to increase osteogenesis and osteogenic differentiation in vivo and in vitro . In the following review, we will discuss the most advanced and significant knowledge of biological functions of exosomes in bone regeneration and their clinical applications in osseous diseases. Impact statement Mesenchymal stem cells have been shown to be a promising tool in bone tissue engineering. Recently, it has been suggested that they secrete exosomes containing messenger RNA, proteins, and lipids, thus acting through paracrine signaling mechanisms. Considering that exosomes are nonteratogenic and have low immunogenic potential, they could potentially replace stem-cell based therapy and thus eradicate the risk of neoplastic transformation associated with cell transplantations in bone regeneration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/ten.teb.2020.0246

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 141 · Cited by 41

Authors
Huber, J., Griffin, M. F., Longaker, M. T., & Quarto, N.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Huber, Julika
  • Quarto, Natalina
Venue
Tissue Engineering Part B Reviews
Published
2022-02
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
101-113
ISSN
  • 1937-3368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-3376
OpenAlex
W3112149397
Cited by
41
References
141
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tissue Engineering Part B Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE026730, R01DE027323)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Keywords
exosomes, bone tissue engineering, mesenchymal stem cells, paracrine signaling, bone regeneration, osteogenic differentiation, cell-to-cell communication, cell-free therapy
MeSH terms
Cell Differentiation, Osteogenesis, Tissue Engineering, Regenerative Medicine, Exosomes, Mesenchymal Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review