Exosomes: a tool for bone tissue engineering
Open accessAbstract
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been repeatedly shown to be a valuable source for cell-based therapy in regenerative medicine, including bony tissue repair. However, engraftment at the injury site is poor. Recently, it has been suggested that MSCs and other cells act through a paracrine signaling mechanism. Exosomes are nanostructures that have been implicated in this process. They carry DNA, RNA, proteins, and lipids and play an important role in cell-to-cell communication directly modulating their target cell at a transcriptional level. In a bone microenvironment, they have been shown to increase osteogenesis and osteogenic differentiation in vivo and in vitro . In the following review, we will discuss the most advanced and significant knowledge of biological functions of exosomes in bone regeneration and their clinical applications in osseous diseases. Impact statement Mesenchymal stem cells have been shown to be a promising tool in bone tissue engineering. Recently, it has been suggested that they secrete exosomes containing messenger RNA, proteins, and lipids, thus acting through paracrine signaling mechanisms. Considering that exosomes are nonteratogenic and have low immunogenic potential, they could potentially replace stem-cell based therapy and thus eradicate the risk of neoplastic transformation associated with cell transplantations in bone regeneration.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Secreted exosomes dominate the beneficial effects of implanted MSCs on bone reconstruction.
“A growing body of evidence indicates that the secreted exosomes dominate the beneficial effects of implanted MSCs on bone reconstruction [16,17].”
From Hydrogel scaffold encapsulating MSC-Exos and ZIF-8 promotes bone regeneration via coordinating osteogenesis and immunomodulation (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 141 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Huber, J., Griffin, M. F., Longaker, M. T., & Quarto, N.
- Affiliations
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Huber, Julika
- Quarto, Natalina
- Venue
- Tissue Engineering Part B Reviews
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2022-02
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101-113
- ISSN
- 1937-3368 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-3376
- PMC
- PMC8892957
- OpenAlex
- W3112149397
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 141
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 0.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Tissue Engineering Part B Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE026730, R01DE027323)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Keywords
- exosomes, bone tissue engineering, mesenchymal stem cells, paracrine signaling, bone regeneration, osteogenic differentiation, cell-to-cell communication, cell-free therapy
- MeSH terms
- Cell Differentiation, Osteogenesis, Tissue Engineering, Regenerative Medicine, Exosomes, Mesenchymal Stem Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review