Serum TSH and Total T 4 in the United States Population and Their Association With Participant Characteristics: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 1999–2002)
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Describe thyrotropin (TSH) and thyroxine (T4) levels in the U.S. population and their association with selected participant characteristics. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) collected from 4392 participants, reflecting 222 million individuals, during 1999-2002. RESULTS: Hypothyroidism prevalence (TSH > 4.5 mIU/L) in the general population was 3.7%, and hyperthyroidism prevalence (TSH < 0.1 mIU/L) was 0.5%. Among women of reproductive age (12-49 years), hypothyroidism prevalence was 3.1%. Individuals aged 80 years and older had five times greater odds for hypothyroidism compared to 12- to 49-year-olds (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 5.0, p = 0.0002). ORs were adjusted for sex, race, annual income, pregnancy status, and usage of thyroid-related medications (levothyroxine/thyroid, estrogen, androgen, lithium, and amiodarone). Compared to non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks had a lower risk for hypothyroidism (OR = 0.46, p = 0.04) and a higher risk for hyperthyroidism (OR = 3.18, p = 0.0005), while Mexican Americans had the same risk as non-Hispanic whites for hypothyroidism, but a higher risk for hyperthyroidism (OR = 1.98, p = 0.04). Among those taking levothyroxine or desiccated thyroid, the adjusted risk for either hypothyroidism (OR = 4.0, p = 0.0001) or hyperthyroidism (OR = 11.4, p = 4 x 10(-9)) was elevated. CONCLUSIONS: Associations with known factors such as age, race, and sex were confirmed using this data set. Understanding the prevalence of abnormal thyroid tests among reproductive-aged women informs decisions about screening in this population. The finding that individuals on thyroid hormone replacement medication often remain hypothyroid or become hyperthyroid underscores the importance of monitoring.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 390
- Authors
- Aoki, Y., Belin, R. M., Clickner, R., Jeffries, R., Phillips, L., & Mahaffey, K. R.
- Affiliations
- Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health (US)
- Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
- WESTAT, Rockville, Maryland.
- Environmental Protection Agency (US)
- Venue
- Thyroid
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1211-1223
- ISSN
- 1050-7256 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9077
- OpenAlex
- W2090365086
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 10.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Thyroid (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- serum TSH, total thyroxine, thyroid function, levothyroxine, thyroid hormone replacement, thyroid screening, women of reproductive age, age differences, racial differences, Hispanic population, NHANES
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Female, Humans, Hyperthyroidism, Hypothyroidism, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Sampling Studies, Sex Characteristics, Thyrotropin, Thyroxine, United States, Prevalence, Racial Groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review