The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preoperative Diagnosis of Cervical Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Comparison of Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and Combined Ultrasound with Computed Tomography
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although ultrasound (US) is routinely used for the preoperative evaluation of neck nodes in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), the diagnostic role of computed tomography (CT) has not been established. The purpose of our study is to determine the diagnostic accuracies of US, CT, and combined US and CT (US/CT) for detecting metastatic neck nodes in patients with PTC. METHODS: 165 consecutive patients (140 females and 25 males, mean age 47.9 years) with surgically proven PTC underwent US and CT for preoperative evaluation. CT was performed 2 or 3 months before radioiodine therapy. We assessed the diagnostic accuracies of US, CT, and US/CT using level-by-level analysis. RESULTS: In terms of predicting node metastases, overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of US were 51%, 92%, 77%, 81%, and 76%, respectively. Those of CT were 62%, 93%, 81%, 84%, and 80%, respectively, and those of US/CT were 66%, 88%, 79%, 77%, and 81%, respectively, at all neck levels. US/CT significantly increased sensitivity and demonstrated similar specificity compared with US alone in lateral neck levels (p = 0.02 and p = 1.0, respectively). US/CT increased sensitivity (p = 0.01), but decreased specificity compared with US alone in the central neck levels (p = 0.02). CT provided additional benefit for detecting metastatic nodes at more than one level in 8% of all patients, in 14% of patients with suspected nodal metastasis on US, and in 25% of patients with metastatic lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: The US/CT combination was found to be superior to US alone for the detection of metastatic lymph nodes in the lateral neck levels in PTC patients by level-by-level analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Haugen, B. R., Alexander, E. K., Bible, K. C., Doherty, G. M., Mandel, S. J., Nikiforov, Y. E., Pacini, F., Randolph, G. W., Sawka, A. M., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2016) · Thyroid® · doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0020 · Cited by 16,535
Guidelines for the management of thyroid cancer
Perros, P., Boelaert, K., Colley, S., Evans, C., Evans, R. M., Gerrard BA, G., Gilbert, J., Harrison, B., Johnson, S. J., Giles, T. E., et al. (2014) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/cen.12515 · Cited by 1,372
Ha, E. J., Chung, S. R., Na, D. G., Ahn, H. S., Chung, J., Lee, J. Y., Park, J. S., Yoo, R.-E., Baek, J. H., Baek, S. M., et al. (2021) · Korean Journal of Radiology · doi:10.3348/kjr.2021.0713 · Cited by 298
Self-citationStack, B. C., Ferris, R. L., Goldenberg, D., Haymart, M., Shaha, A., Sheth, S., Sosa, J. A., & Tufano, F. T. A. T. A. (2012) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2011.0312 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, E., Park, J. S., Son, K.-R., Kim, J.-H., Jeon, S. J., & Na, D. G.
- Venue
- Thyroid
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 411-418
- ISSN
- 1050-7256 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9077
- OpenAlex
- W2091000434
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preoperative Diagnosis of Cervical Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Comparison of Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and Combined Ultrasound with Computed Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/thy.2007.0269
- The paper
- Kim, E., Park, J. S., Son, K.-R., Kim, J.-H., Jeon, S. J., & Na, D. G. (2008). Preoperative Diagnosis of Cervical Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Comparison of Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and Combined Ultrasound with Computed Tomography. Thyroid. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2007.0269
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.