Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Clinical Risk Factors Associated with Cervical Lymph Node Recurrence in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

Baek, Seung-Kuk, Jung, Kwang-Yoon, Kang, Sun-Mook, Kwon, Soon-Young, Woo, Jeong-Soo, Cho, Seung-Hyun, Chung, Eun-Jae·2010·Thyroid

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recurrence of regional cervical lymph nodes in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is not uncommon, and is an important factor affecting the quality of life. The aims of this study are to investigate the risk factors that are associated with regional lymph node recurrence by comparing a group of patients with regional lymph node recurrence with a group without lymph node recurrence, and to analyze the clinical characteristics of recurrent regional lymph nodes in PTC. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 189 patients who underwent surgery for PTC. By comparing a group with recurrent cervical lymph nodes (n = 33) with a group without recurrent cervical lymph nodes (n = 156), the risk factors for cervical lymph node recurrence were investigated and the clinical characteristics of recurrent cervical lymph nodes were analyzed. RESULTS: Tumor size >2 cm, presence of extrathyroid tumor spread, high T stage, and presence of lymph node metastasis were associated with regional lymph node recurrence in univariate analysis (p < 0.05). Among them, only the N stage was significantly associated with regional recurrence in multivariate analysis (p < 0.05). The disease-free survival period was shorter in the lymph node metastasis-positive group, and the 10-year disease-free survival rate was 77.8% in the lymph node metastasis-negative group and 57.9% in the lymph node metastasis-positive group (p < 0.05). Among 130 patients without lymph node metastasis, regional recurrence occurred in 13 patients (10%), and the frequent levels of regional recurrence were levels II-IV of ipsilateral neck. In the patients with lymph node metastasis, the frequent levels were levels IV-VI of ipsilateral side and level II of the contralateral side. CONCLUSION: Considering the low incidence of regional lymph node recurrence and the levels with frequent regional recurrence in patients without lymph node metastasis, elective neck dissection in all cases of total thyroidectomy may be immoderate. However, if any risk factors for regional recurrence, including large tumor size, presence of extrathyroid spread, high T stage, and presence of lymph node metastasis, are detected by preoperative and intraoperative evaluation, a systematic compartment-oriented lymphadenectomy should be considered because of the high possibility of regional recurrence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/thy.2008.0243

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Baek, S.-K., Jung, K.-Y., Kang, S.-M., Kwon, S.-Y., Woo, J.-S., Cho, S.-H., & Chung, E.-J.
Venue
Thyroid
Published
2010-02
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
147-152
ISSN
  • 1050-7256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9077
OpenAlex
W2054880323
Cited by
198
References
0
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Risk Factors Associated with Cervical Lymph Node Recurrence in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/thy.2008.0243
The paper
Baek, S.-K., Jung, K.-Y., Kang, S.-M., Kwon, S.-Y., Woo, J.-S., Cho, S.-H., & Chung, E.-J. (2010). Clinical Risk Factors Associated with Cervical Lymph Node Recurrence in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Thyroid. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2008.0243

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.