The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Real-Time Elastography for the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: Work-up of thyroid nodules remains challenging. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) has been shown to be the most cost-effective way to select patients for surgery with sensitivities of 54%–90% and specificities of 60%–96% for the detection of malignant lesions. Ultrasound-based real-time elastography (RTE) enables the determination of tissue elasticity and has shown promising results for the differentiation of thyroid nodules. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the overall performance of RTE for the differentiation of thyroid nodules. Methods: Literature databases were searched. The inclusion criteria for studies were the use of FNA cytology histopathology of surgical specimens as the diagnostic reference standard and assessment of sensitivity and specificity of RTE. The meta-analysis was performed using an inverse variance method and the Der Simonian and Laird Random effect estimator in case of established heterogeneity. Results: Eight studies that included a total of 639 thyroid nodules were analyzed. The overall mean sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules by RTE of the eight studies was 92% confidence interval 88–96 and 90% confidence interval 85–95, respectively. A significant heterogeneity was found for specificity of the different studies. Conclusions: RTE has a high sensitivity and specificity in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. This technique might be useful in conjunction or even instead of FNA to select patients with thyroid nodules for surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Ward, E., Murray, T., Xu, J., & Thun, M. J. (2007) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.57.1.43 · Cited by 7,439
Whiting, P., Rutjes, A. W., Reitsma, J. B., Bossuyt, P. M., & Kleijnen, J. (2003) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-3-25 · Cited by 3,592
The Spectrum of Thyroid Disorders in an Iodine-Deficient Community: The Pescopagano Survey
Aghini-Lombardi, F. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.84.2.561 · Cited by 288
Cited by
Remonti, L. R., Kramer, C. K., Leitão, C. B., Pinto, L. C. F., & Gross, J. L. (2015) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2014.0353 · Cited by 411
Săftoiu, A., Vilmann, P., Gorunescu, F., Janssen, J., Hocke, M., Larsen, M., Iglesias–Garcia, J., Arcidiacono, P., Will, U., Giovannini, M., et al. (2012) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2011.09.014 · Cited by 198
Deep learning in ultrasound elastography imaging: A review
Li, H., Bhatt, M., Qu, Z., Zhang, S., Hartel, M. C., Khademhosseini, A., & Cloutier, G. (2022) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.15856 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Bojunga, J., Herrmann, E., Meyer, G., Weber, S., Zeuzem, S., & Friedrich-Rust, M.
- Venue
- Thyroid®
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1145-1150
- ISSN
- 1050-7256 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9077
- OpenAlex
- W2028831113
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Real-Time Elastography for the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules: A Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/thy.2010.0079
- The paper
- Bojunga, J., Herrmann, E., Meyer, G., Weber, S., Zeuzem, S., & Friedrich-Rust, M. (2010). Real-Time Elastography for the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules: A Meta-Analysis. Thyroid®. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2010.0079
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.