Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Coexistent BRAF V600E and TERT Promoter Mutations on Poor Clinical Outcomes in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Moon, Shinje, Song, Young Shin, Kim, Ye An, Lim, Jung Ah, Cho, Sun Wook, Moon, Jae Hoon, Hahn, Seokyung, Park, Do Joon, Park, Young Joo·2017·Thyroid

Abstract

Background: The presence of a telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation has been suggested as a potential prognostic marker for thyroid cancer, and a synergistic association with the BRAFV600E mutation has been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to verify the role of this genetic duet in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). Methods: Studies of the association of BRAFV600E and TERT promoter mutations with clinicopathologic features, recurrence, or PTC-related mortality were included from PubMed and Embase databases (inception to September 2016). Results: Thirteen eligible studies incorporating 4347 patients with PTC were included, and 283 (median 8.3%) of these patients had coexistent BRAFV600E and TERT promoter mutations. The coexistence of the two mutations was far more strongly associated with high-risk clinicopathologic features than either mutation alone was, including advanced TNM stage (vs. BRAFV600E: odds ratio [OR] = 4.19 [confidence interval (CI) 3.07–5.71]; vs. TERT: OR = 4.66 [CI 2.67–8.13]), extrathyroidal extension (vs. BRAFV600E: OR = 3.1 [CI 2.2–4.37]; vs. TERT: OR = 5.66 [CI 3.02–10.6]), lymph node metastasis (vs. BRAFV600E: OR = 1.59 [CI 1.16–2.17]; vs. TERT: OR = 2.03 [CI 1.22–3.38]), and distant metastasis (vs. BRAFV600E: OR = 11.76 [CI 5.63–24.58]). The coexistence of the mutations showed the highest risk of recurrence (coexistence vs. no mutations: hazard ratio [HR] = 6.60 [CI 3.82–11.40]; BRAFV600E vs. no mutations: HR = 1.31 [CI 0.49–3.46]; TERT vs. no mutations: HR = 3.38 [CI 0.85–13.35]). Moreover, PTC-related mortality was significantly higher with coexistent mutations than in the presence of BRAFV600E alone (HR = 20.07 [CI 8.37–48.09]). Conclusions: Coexistent BRAFV600E and TERT promoter mutations have a synergistic effect on clinical outcomes in PTC, whereas each mutation alone has a modest effect. Therefore, molecular testing of BRAFV600E and TERT promoter mutations together is useful in assessing risk stratification of PTC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/thy.2016.0350

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 173

Metadata

Authors
Moon, S., Song, Y. S., Kim, Y. A., Lim, J. A., Cho, S. W., Moon, J. H., Hahn, S., Park, D. J., & Park, Y. J.
Venue
Thyroid
Published
2017-05
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
651-660
ISSN
  • 1050-7256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9077
OpenAlex
W2586985245
Cited by
173
References
1
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Coexistent BRAF V600E and TERT Promoter Mutations on Poor Clinical Outcomes in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/thy.2016.0350
The paper
Moon, S., Song, Y. S., Kim, Y. A., Lim, J. A., Cho, S. W., Moon, J. H., Hahn, S., Park, D. J., & Park, Y. J. (2017). Effects of Coexistent BRAF V600E and TERT Promoter Mutations on Poor Clinical Outcomes in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Thyroid. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2016.0350

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.