The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Coexistent BRAF V600E and TERT Promoter Mutations on Poor Clinical Outcomes in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: The presence of a telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation has been suggested as a potential prognostic marker for thyroid cancer, and a synergistic association with the BRAFV600E mutation has been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to verify the role of this genetic duet in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). Methods: Studies of the association of BRAFV600E and TERT promoter mutations with clinicopathologic features, recurrence, or PTC-related mortality were included from PubMed and Embase databases (inception to September 2016). Results: Thirteen eligible studies incorporating 4347 patients with PTC were included, and 283 (median 8.3%) of these patients had coexistent BRAFV600E and TERT promoter mutations. The coexistence of the two mutations was far more strongly associated with high-risk clinicopathologic features than either mutation alone was, including advanced TNM stage (vs. BRAFV600E: odds ratio [OR] = 4.19 [confidence interval (CI) 3.07–5.71]; vs. TERT: OR = 4.66 [CI 2.67–8.13]), extrathyroidal extension (vs. BRAFV600E: OR = 3.1 [CI 2.2–4.37]; vs. TERT: OR = 5.66 [CI 3.02–10.6]), lymph node metastasis (vs. BRAFV600E: OR = 1.59 [CI 1.16–2.17]; vs. TERT: OR = 2.03 [CI 1.22–3.38]), and distant metastasis (vs. BRAFV600E: OR = 11.76 [CI 5.63–24.58]). The coexistence of the mutations showed the highest risk of recurrence (coexistence vs. no mutations: hazard ratio [HR] = 6.60 [CI 3.82–11.40]; BRAFV600E vs. no mutations: HR = 1.31 [CI 0.49–3.46]; TERT vs. no mutations: HR = 3.38 [CI 0.85–13.35]). Moreover, PTC-related mortality was significantly higher with coexistent mutations than in the presence of BRAFV600E alone (HR = 20.07 [CI 8.37–48.09]). Conclusions: Coexistent BRAFV600E and TERT promoter mutations have a synergistic effect on clinical outcomes in PTC, whereas each mutation alone has a modest effect. Therefore, molecular testing of BRAFV600E and TERT promoter mutations together is useful in assessing risk stratification of PTC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Haugen, B. R., Alexander, E. K., Bible, K. C., Doherty, G. M., Mandel, S. J., Nikiforov, Y. E., Pacini, F., Randolph, G. W., Sawka, A. M., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2016) · Thyroid® · doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0020 · Cited by 16,535
Cited by
Ringel, M. D., Sosa, J. A., Baloch, Z., Bischoff, L., Bloom, G., Brent, G. A., Brock, P. L., Chou, R., Flavell, R. R., Goldner, W., et al. (2025) · Thyroid® · doi:10.1177/10507256251363120 · Cited by 710
Metadata
- Authors
- Moon, S., Song, Y. S., Kim, Y. A., Lim, J. A., Cho, S. W., Moon, J. H., Hahn, S., Park, D. J., & Park, Y. J.
- Venue
- Thyroid
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-05
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 651-660
- ISSN
- 1050-7256 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9077
- OpenAlex
- W2586985245
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Coexistent BRAF V600E and TERT Promoter Mutations on Poor Clinical Outcomes in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/thy.2016.0350
- The paper
- Moon, S., Song, Y. S., Kim, Y. A., Lim, J. A., Cho, S. W., Moon, J. H., Hahn, S., Park, D. J., & Park, Y. J. (2017). Effects of Coexistent BRAF V600E and TERT Promoter Mutations on Poor Clinical Outcomes in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Thyroid. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2016.0350
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.