Cited by 56Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealthcare Systems and TechnologyCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management

Telemedicine for Dermatology Care in Rural Patients

BURGISS, SAMUEL G., JULIUS, CLARK E., WATSON, HARRY W., HAYNES, BRENDA K., BUONOCORE, EDWARD, SMITH, GARY T.·1997·Telemedicine Journal

Abstract

Background Rural patients who develop dermatologic disorders often do not seek specialty care because of multiple logistical and economic factors. Objective To assess the effect of teledermatology consultations on the cost of care for a given episode of illness. Methods Telemedicine records were reviewed for 119 visits by 87 patients referred for teledermatology consultation over a 17-month period. Results Seven patients (8%) required follow-up in the dermatologist office for extended care, while 20 patients (23%) (52 visits) underwent follow-up teledermatology evaluation. The average duration of the dermatologic condition for each patient prior to the telemedical consultation was 17 months. The average of care for the diagnosed dermatologic condition, for all patients during an average period of 8 months prior to teledermatology was $294, compared with $141 for the 6 months after diagnosis by teledermatology. Conclusions Telemedicine can be effective for dermatology consultation in new patients referred from rural communities. Our data indicate teledermatology can decrease the cost of care for the diagnosed condition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tmj.1.1997.3.227

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many feasibility studies of telemedicine have been conducted in inaccessible settings such as the military, rural areas, nursing homes, or developing countries.

    “There are many feasibility studies, often in inaccessible settings: for the military, in rural areas, in nursing homes or developing countries.”

    From Telemedicine in dermatology: a randomised controlled trial (2006) · cites this paper as [7]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 6 · Cited by 56

Authors
BURGISS, S. G., JULIUS, C. E., WATSON, H. W., HAYNES, B. K., BUONOCORE, E., & SMITH, G. T.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee Medical Center (US)
Venue
Telemedicine Journal
Published
1997-01
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
227-233
ISSN
1078-3024 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2329544432
Cited by
56
References
6
Citations by year
2023: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Keywords
teledermatology, telemedicine, rural health care, dermatologic disorders, cost of care, access to specialist care, follow-up care, teleconsultation
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Dermatology, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Skin Diseases, Tennessee, Health Care Costs, Rural Health Services, Remote Consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review