Telemedicine for Dermatology Care in Rural Patients
Abstract
Background Rural patients who develop dermatologic disorders often do not seek specialty care because of multiple logistical and economic factors. Objective To assess the effect of teledermatology consultations on the cost of care for a given episode of illness. Methods Telemedicine records were reviewed for 119 visits by 87 patients referred for teledermatology consultation over a 17-month period. Results Seven patients (8%) required follow-up in the dermatologist office for extended care, while 20 patients (23%) (52 visits) underwent follow-up teledermatology evaluation. The average duration of the dermatologic condition for each patient prior to the telemedical consultation was 17 months. The average of care for the diagnosed dermatologic condition, for all patients during an average period of 8 months prior to teledermatology was $294, compared with $141 for the 6 months after diagnosis by teledermatology. Conclusions Telemedicine can be effective for dermatology consultation in new patients referred from rural communities. Our data indicate teledermatology can decrease the cost of care for the diagnosed condition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many feasibility studies of telemedicine have been conducted in inaccessible settings such as the military, rural areas, nursing homes, or developing countries.
“There are many feasibility studies, often in inaccessible settings: for the military, in rural areas, in nursing homes or developing countries.”
From Telemedicine in dermatology: a randomised controlled trial (2006) · cites this paper as [7]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 6 · Cited by 56
- Authors
- BURGISS, S. G., JULIUS, C. E., WATSON, H. W., HAYNES, B. K., BUONOCORE, E., & SMITH, G. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Tennessee Medical Center (US)
- ORCID
- SMITH, GARY T.
- Venue
- Telemedicine Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 227-233
- ISSN
- 1078-3024 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2329544432
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2023: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 2.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Telemedicine Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
- Keywords
- teledermatology, telemedicine, rural health care, dermatologic disorders, cost of care, access to specialist care, follow-up care, teleconsultation
- MeSH terms
- Cost-Benefit Analysis, Dermatology, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Skin Diseases, Tennessee, Health Care Costs, Rural Health Services, Remote Consultation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review