Cited by 144Electronic Health Records SystemsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Exploring Challenges and Potentials of Personal Health Records in Diabetes Self-Management: Implementation and Initial Assessment

Hess, Rachel, Bryce, Cindy L., Paone, Suzanne, Fischer, Gary, McTigue, Kathleen M., Olshansky, Ellen, Zickmund, Susan, Fitzgerald, Katharine +1 more·2007·Telemedicine and e-Health

Abstract

The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) has implemented a personal health record grounded in the Chronic Care Model, UPMC HealthTrak, to assist patients with diabetes self-management. UPMC HealthTrak is based in the physician office and connects the patient, physician, and electronic medical record (EMR). Its functionalities include secure, electronic communication with the physician's office, along with preventive healthcare reminders, and disease-specific tools and information. In this paper, we describe challenges to office-based implementation of and initial patient reaction to the technology in the context of diabetes care. UPMC has deployed a secure Web-based patient portal, UPMC HealthTrak. We implemented UPMC HealthTrak in the ambulatory setting and assessed its impact on patient-practice communication. We conducted 10 90-minute focus groups (five pre- and five postimplementation) to assess patient reaction to UPMC HealthTrak. Focus groups were analyzed using grounded theory techniques. During the period September 2004-January 2007, there was no significant change in number of patient encounters or telephone calls received in our office, but the number of HealthTrak messages increased. Our 39 pre- and postimplementation focus group participants felt that the system would enhance communication with the office, and that the reminder system would be helpful. They also liked having access to laboratory tests remotely. They were frustrated when tests were not released and messages not answered. A Web-based patient portal can be integrated into a clinical office, although patients may not quickly change communication patterns. Patients are responsive to technology. Future work should focus on diabetes-related outcomes assessment and intensifying interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tmj.2006.0089

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 144

Authors
Hess, R., Bryce, C. L., Paone, S., Fischer, G., McTigue, K. M., Olshansky, E., Zickmund, S., Fitzgerald, K., & Siminerio, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Phoenix (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Telemedicine and e-Health
Published
2007-10
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
509-518
ISSN
  • 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3669
OpenAlex
W2086835990
Cited by
144
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
15.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG024254, K23AG024254)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K08DK067192, DK067192)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024153)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
personal health records, diabetes self-management, patient portals, Chronic Care Model, electronic reminders, implementation barriers
MeSH terms
Communication, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Pennsylvania, Self Care, Program Evaluation, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Program Development, Focus Groups, Telemedicine, Internet, Consumer Health Information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review