Cited by 77Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourTechnology Use by Older Adults

Change of Patients' Perceptions of Telemedicine After Brief Use

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate whether patients' perceptions regarding a Web-based telemedicine service, for instruction and monitoring of an exercise program, change after brief use. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients were allocated, matched on gender and age, to a control group (10) or an experimental group (20). After basic training, the experimental group was given a 15 min opportunity to use a Web-based telemedicine service. Patients' perceptions regarding the telemedicine service were measured using a questionnaire, based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). This questionnaire was administered to both the control and experimental group before and after the experimental group's intervention. Both groups were compared with respect to any change in perceptions related to the Web-based telemedicine service. Results: The experimental group showed a significantly greater change on the TAM constructs perceived usefulness [ F (1,27)=3.40, p =0.08] and perceived ease of use [ F (1,27)=5.37, p =0.03] than the control group, who showed no statistically significant change of perceptions. Patients within the experimental group became significantly more positive about the usefulness and ease-of-use of the Web-based telemedicine program after a brief period of use. Conclusions: These findings show that brief use of a Web-based telemedicine service has a significant positive effect on patients' perceptions of this service. Therefore, as patients do not have prior experience with innovative telemedicine services, offering patients a risk-free way to explore and experiment with the service can increase the development of accurate perceptions and user needs. Ultimately, this will increase patients' acceptance of telemedicine. Future studies should investigate the effect of continued usage on patients' perceptions of telemedicine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tmj.2010.0208

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cranen, K., Veld, R. H. I., Ijzerman, M., & Vollenbroek-Hutten, M.
Affiliations
  • Roessingh Research and Development (NL)
  • University of Twente (NL)
Corresponding author
Cranen, Karlijn
Venue
Telemedicine and e-Health
Published
2011-09
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
530-535
ISSN
  • 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3669
OpenAlex
W2141662612
Cited by
77
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
telemedicine, patient perspectives, web-based telemedicine, technology acceptance model, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, technology acceptance
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attitude, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patients, Patient Satisfaction, Telemedicine, Internet, Resistance Training, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review