Content Analysis: First-Time Patient User Challenges with Top-Rated Commercial Diabetes Apps
Open accessAbstract
Background/Introduction: Using a mobile application (app) may improve diabetes self-management. However, the use of diabetes apps is low, possibly due to design and usability issues. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers to app use among adult patients with diabetes who were testing diabetes apps for the first time. Materials and Methods: We conducted a content analysis of observation notes and patient comments collected during the testing of two top commercially available diabetes apps as part of a crossover randomized trial. Participants were adult patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy. We analyzed field notes and transcriptions of audio recordings. Open coding derived categories of usability issues, which then were grouped into themes and subthemes on usability problem types. Results: A total of 92 adult Android smartphone users were recruited online (e.g., Facebook) and in-person postings. Three major themes described problems with data input, app report display and presentation, and self-learning options. Data entry modes were problematic because of overcrowded app screens, complicated “save data” steps, and a lack of data entry confirmation. The app icons, wording, entry headings, and analysis reports were not intuitive to understand. Participants wanted self-learning options (e.g., pop-up messages) during app use. Conclusions: Patient testing of top commercially available diabetes apps revealed key usability design issues in data entry, app report, and self-help learning options. Good app training for patients is necessary for both initial use and long-term use of diabetes apps to support self-management.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Can Mobile Health Technologies Transform Health Care?
Steinhubl, S. R., Muse, E. D., & Topol, E. J. (2013) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281078 · Cited by 496 · see citing works
Computer-based diabetes self-management interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Pal, K., Eastwood, S. V., Michie, S., Farmer, A. J., Barnard, M. L., Peacock, R., Wood, B., Inniss, J. D., & Murray, E. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008776.pub2 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Harrer, M., Adam, S. H., Fleischmann, R. J., Baumeister, H., Auerbach, R., Bruffaerts, R., Cuijpers, P., Kessler, R. C., Berking, M., Lehr, D., et al. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.9293 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Promise of and potential for patient-facing technologies to enable meaningful use
Ahern, D. K., Woods, S. S., Lightowler, M. C., Finley, S. W., & Houston, T. K. (2011) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.01.005 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Fu, H., McMahon, S. K., Gross, C. R., Adam, T. J., & Wyman, J. F. (2017) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2017.06.016 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Self-citationStructured Type 1 Diabetes Education Delivered Within Routine Care
Cooke, D., Bond, R., Lawton, J., Rankin, D., Heller, S., Clark, M., Speight, J., & for the U.K. NIHR DAFNE Study Group (2013) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc12-0080 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Fu, H. N. C., Jin, D., & Adam, T. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fu, Helen N.C.
- Venue
- Telemedicine and e-Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 663-669
- ISSN
- 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-3669
- PMC
- PMC8349717
- OpenAlex
- W3049397091
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002494)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Keywords
- diabetes apps, mobile health, usability, barriers to app use, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, insulin therapy, diabetes self-management, data entry, patient training, mobile application
- MeSH terms
- Smartphone, Self-Management, Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Telemedicine, Mobile Applications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review