Cited by 259LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 5 of the 35 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Enacted Stigma, Mental Health, and Protective Factors Among Transgender Youth in Canada

Open access

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to assess the Minority Stress Model which proposes that the stress of experiencing stigma leads to adverse mental health outcomes, but social supports (e.g., school and family connectedness) will reduce this negative effect. Methods: We measured stigma-related experiences, social supports, and mental health (self-injury, suicide, depression, and anxiety) among a sample of 923 Canadian transgender 14- to 25-year-old adolescents and young adults using a bilingual online survey. Logistic regression models were conducted to analyze the relationship between these risk and protective factors and dichotomous mental health outcomes among two separate age groups, 14- to 18-year-old and 19- to 25-year-old participants. Results: Experiences of discrimination, harassment, and violence (enacted stigma) were positively related to mental health problems and social support was negatively associated with mental health problems in all models among both age groups. Among 14–18 year olds, we examined school connectedness, family connectedness, and perception of friends caring separately, and family connectedness was always the strongest protective predictor in multivariate models. In all the mental health outcomes we examined, transgender youth reporting low levels of enacted stigma experiences and high levels of protective factors tended to report favorable mental health outcomes. Conversely, the majority of participants reporting high levels of enacted stigma and low levels of protective factors reported adverse mental health outcomes. Conclusion: While these findings are limited by nonprobability sampling procedures and potential additional unmeasured risk and protective factors, the results provide positive evidence for the Minority Stress Model in this population and affirm the need for policies and programs to support schools and families to support transgender youth.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/trgh.2017.0031

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

23 Own result · 18 No full text of the sources · 14 Own method · 7 Own interpretation · 3 Supported · 3 Sources not found · 2 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 26
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 17
35 of 35
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Missing values on scales were missing at random with respect to mental health, enacted stigma, and protective factors.

    “We had no reason to believe that the missing values differed across different levels of mental health, enacted stigma, or protective factors (i.e., we believe data were missing at random); so we did not attempt to correct for this missingness.”
1 of 1

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Fazio AF, 1977, Vital Health Stat 2, 73, 1
  2. Patten SB, 1997, Chronic Dis Can, 18, 109

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Veale, J. F., Peter, T., Travers, R., & Saewyc, E. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Waikato (NZ)
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Veale, Jaimie F.
Venue
Transgender Health
Published
2017-12
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
207-216
ISSN
2380-193X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2774228466
Cited by
259
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9
FWCI
16.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transgender Health (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Commons (University of Waikato) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Michael Smith Health Research BC
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP119472)
  • Institute of Gender and Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
transgender youth, enacted stigma, minority stress model, mental health, protective factors, discrimination, harassment, violence, school connectedness, family connectedness, social support, self-harm, suicide, depression, anxiety, adolescents and young adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review