The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Emergence of Staphylococcus aureus ST398
Abstract
The epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has changed dramatically over the past 15 years. Initially a nosocomial pathogen, newly emergent strains of MRSA have become increasingly common in the community among individuals lacking contact with healthcare. More recently, a third group of MRSA strains have been identified in association with livestock, particularly swine. These strains, termed livestock-associated MRSA, have now been identified in Europe, North America, and Asia in humans and animals. One molecular type, ST398, has been the dominant strain of livestock-associated MRSA identified to date. The emergence of this strain in animals and humans will be described in this review, including colonization and clinical infections caused by this strain. We also discuss lingering research questions and implications for controlling spread of this bacterium in an agricultural environment and beyond.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Klevens, R. M. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.15.1763 · Cited by 3,726 · cited 2×
“Recent studies have shown that methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) represents a major infectious disease burden in the United States, causing an estimated 94,000 infections and 18,000 deaths in 2005 (Klevens et al. 2007).”
The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections
Wertheim, H. F., Melles, D. C., Vos, M. C., van Leeuwen, W., van Belkum, A., Verbrugh, H. A., & Nouwen, J. L. (2005) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(05)70295-4 · Cited by 2,685
Oliveira, D. C., Tomasz, A., & de Lencastre, H. (2002) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(02)00227-x · Cited by 494
Occurrence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in rats living on pig farms
van de Giessen, A. W., van Santen-Verheuvel, M. G., Hengeveld, P. D., Bosch, T., Broens, E. M., & Reusken, C. B. E. M. (2009) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.05.016 · Cited by 91
Cited by
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Molecular Characterization, Evolution, and Epidemiology
Lakhundi, S., & Zhang, K. (2018) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00020-18 · Cited by 1,637
New epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus infection in Asia
Chen, C.-J., & Huang, Y.-C. (2014) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12705 · Cited by 447
Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in animals and humans
Graveland, H., Duim, B., van Duijkeren, E., Heederik, D., & Wagenaar, J. A. (2011) · International Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2011.09.004 · Cited by 308
Livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus: origin, evolution and public health threat
Fitzgerald, J. R. (2012) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2012.01.006 · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, T. C., & Pearson, N.
- Venue
- Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 327-339
- ISSN
- 1530-3667 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7759
- OpenAlex
- W1987696358
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Emergence of Staphylococcus aureus ST398. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/vbz.2010.0072
- The paper
- Smith, T. C., & Pearson, N. (2011). The Emergence of Staphylococcus aureus ST398. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2010.0072
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.