Neuropsychology of Learning and Memory in Teleost Fish
Abstract
Traditionally, brain and behavior evolution was viewed as an anagenetic process that occurred in successive stages of increasing complexity and advancement. Fishes, considered the most primitive vertebrates, were supposed to have a scarcely differentiated telencephalon, and limited learning capabilities. However, recent developmental, neuroanatomical, and functional data indicate that the evolution of brain and behavior may have been more conservative than previously thought. Experimental data suggest that the properties and neural basis of learning and memory are notably similar among teleost fish and land vertebrates. For example, lesion studies show that the teleost cerebellum is essential in classical conditioning of discrete motor responses. The lateral telencephalic pallium of the teleost fish, proposed as homologous to the hippocampus, is selectively involved in spatial learning and memory, and in trace classical conditioning. In contrast, the medial pallium, considered homologous to the amygdala, is involved in emotional conditioning in teleost fish. The data reviewed here show a remarkable parallelism between mammals and teleost fish concerning the role of different brain centers in learning and memory and cognitive processes. These evidences suggest that these separate memory systems could have appeared early during the evolution of vertebrates, having been conserved through phylogenesis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other brain centers and neural systems in the teleost fish brain, for example, the hippocampal telencephalic pallium and related structures, are specialized to transform egocentric information into 'world-centered' spatial frameworks to construct allocentric representations of the environment that are independent of the subject's own view or position within it.
“In addition, other brain centers and neural systems in the teleost fish brain, for example, the hippocampal telencephalic pallium and related structures (Figure 3), are thought to be specialized to transform the egocentric information into “world-centered” spatial frameworks to construct allocentric representations of the environment that are independent of the subject’s own view or position with”
From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [148]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 107 · Cited by 189
- Authors
- Salas, C., Broglio, C., Durán, E., Gómez, A., Ocaña, F. M., Jiménez-Moya, F., & Rodríguez, F.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
- Laboratory of Psychobiology, University of Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
- Venue
- Zebrafish
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-171
- ISSN
- 1545-8547 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8542
- OpenAlex
- W1983514205
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 107
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 2.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zebrafish (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
- Keywords
- teleosts, learning and memory, cerebellum, classical conditioning, medial pallium, spatial learning, emotional conditioning, trace conditioning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review