The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How to model quantum plasmas
Abstract
Abstract. Traditional plasma physics has mainly focused on regimes characterized by high temperatures and low densities, for which quantummechanical effects have virtually no impact. However, recent technological advances (particularly on miniaturized semiconductor devices and nanoscale objects) have made it possible to envisage practical applications of plasma physics where the quantum nature of the particles plays a crucial role. Here, I shall review different approaches to the modeling of quantum effects in electrostatic collisionless plasmas. The full kinetic model is provided by the Wigner equation, which is the quantum analog of the Vlasov equation. The Wigner formalism is particularly attractive, as it recasts quantum mechanics in the familiar classical phase space, although this comes at the cost of dealing with negative distribution functions. Equivalently, the Wigner model can be expressed in terms of N one-particle Schrödinger equations, coupled by Poisson’s equation: this is the Hartree formalism, which is related to the ‘multi-stream ’ approach of classical plasma physics. In order to reduce the complexity of the above approaches, it is possible to develop a quantum fluid model by taking velocity-space moments of the Wigner equation. Finally, certain regimes at large excitation energies can be described by semiclassical kinetic models (Vlasov-Poisson), provided that the initial ground-state equilibrium is treated quantum-mechanically. The above models are validated and compared both in the linear and nonlinear regimes. 1
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Quantum Correction For Thermodynamic Equilibrium
Wigner, E. (1932) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.40.749 · Cited by 9,283
Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory
Moyal, J. E. (1949) · Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1017/s0305004100000487 · Cited by 3,116
Coherent states via decoherence.
Zurek, W. H., Habib, S., & Paz, J. P. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1187 · Cited by 679
Cited by
Theoretical foundations of quantum hydrodynamics for plasmas
Moldabekov, Z. A., Bonitz, M., & Ramazanov, T. S. (2018) · Physics of Plasmas · doi:10.1063/1.5003910 · Cited by 159
Transient lattice contraction in the solid-to-plasma transition
Ferguson, K. R., Bucher, M., Gorkhover, T., Boutet, S., Fukuzawa, H., Koglin, J. E., Kumagai, Y., Lutman, A., Marinelli, A., Messerschmidt, M., et al. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500837 · Cited by 80
Phase-space modeling of solid-state plasmas: A journey from classical to quantum
Manfredi, G., Hervieux, P.-A., & Hurst, J. (2019) · Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics · doi:10.1007/s41614-019-0034-0 · Cited by 38
Self-citationFluid descriptions of quantum plasmas
Manfredi, G., Hervieux, P.-A., & Hurst, J. (2021) · Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics · doi:10.1007/s41614-021-00056-y · Cited by 29
Self-citationBrodin, G., Ekman, R., & Zamanian, J. (2019) · Physics of Plasmas · doi:10.1063/1.5104339 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Manfredi, G.
- Venue
- Topics in Kinetic Theory
- Publisher
- American Mathematical Society
- Published
- 2005-12-21
- Pages
- 263-287
- OpenAlex
- W1656232303
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 3
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How to model quantum plasmas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1090/fic/046/10
- The paper
- Manfredi, G. (2005). How to model quantum plasmas. Topics in Kinetic Theory. https://doi.org/10.1090/fic/046/10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.