Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 297

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modular Forms, a Computational Approach

Stein, William·2007·Graduate Studies in Mathematics

Abstract

Modular forms Modular forms of level $1$ Modular forms of weight $2$ Dirichlet characters Eisenstein series and Bernoulli numbers Dimension formulas Linear algebra General modular symbols Computing with newforms Computing periods Solutions to selected exercises Appendix A: Computing in higher rank Bibliography Index.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1090/gsm/079

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Metadata

Authors
Stein, W.
Venue
Graduate Studies in Mathematics
Published
2007-02-13
ISSN
1065-7339 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W578225970
Cited by
297
References
50
FWCI
2.63
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modular Forms, a Computational Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1090/gsm/079
The paper
Stein, W. (2007). Modular Forms, a Computational Approach. Graduate Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1090/gsm/079

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.