The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Linear automaton transformations
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The classic Myhill-Nerode theorem [26, 27] provides intuition: every pair of distinct states can be distinguished by some sequence (admitted by one state but not the other). Unless those minimal distinguishing sequences are of length one, looking at the next single token outputted will not reliably assess whether the generative model has an accurate model of the underlying state.”
From Evaluating the World Model Implicit in a Generative Model (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The Myhill-Nerode theorem states that the sets of sequences accepted by a minimal DFA starting at two distinct states are distinct (see Appendix C for a full statement).”
From Evaluating the World Model Implicit in a Generative Model (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Subspace-based signal analysis using singular value decomposition
Van Der Veen, A.-J., Deprettere, E. F., & Swindlehurst, A. L. (1993) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.237536 · Cited by 348
Approximate information state for partially observed systems
Subramanian, J., & Mahajan, A. (2019) · 2019 IEEE 58th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) · doi:10.1109/cdc40024.2019.9029898 · Cited by 23
Evaluating the World Model Implicit in a Generative Model
Vafa, K., Chen, J., Rambachan, A., Kleinberg, J., & Mullainathan, S. (2024) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 · doi:10.52202/079017-0846 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Nerode, A.
- Corresponding author
- Nerode, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society
- Publisher
- American Mathematical Society (AMS)
- Published
- 1958-08
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 541-544
- ISSN
- 0002-9939 (ISSN-L)
- 1088-6826
- OpenAlex
- W2088432971
- Cited by
- 541
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › semigroups and automata theory
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Cellular Automata and Applications
- Keywords
- linear automata, automata theory, linear operators
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
